I am given a 'tariff' function for two countries, $i=1, 2$. Both players can select a tariff between 0 and 100. If player $i$ selects $x_i$ and player $j$ selects $x_j$, country $i$ gets a payoff of $$2000+60x_i+x_ix_j-{x_i}^{2}-90x_j.$$ I need to find a Nash equilibrium for this game. Taking a derivative with respect to player 1, I get $$\pi_1'=60+x_2-2x_1,$$ so the payoff is maximized when $$x_1=\frac{60+x_2}{2}.$$ Symmetrically, for $x_2$, $$x_2=\frac{60+x_1}{2}.$$ Substituting one equation into the other, we get $x=60$ for both players. This makes sense, as both countries' lowering the tariff, to, say, 30 would increase their profits (which is something mentioned by the textbook -- equilibrium not necessarily optimal). My question is, what exactly is the meaning of the profit function for player 1 differentiated with respect to $x_2$? I get $x_1=90$ if I set the derivative equal to $0$, and I am wondering if this has any significance within the game theoretic model.
2026-03-29 14:57:37.1774796257
Meaning of a partial derivative here?
669 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MULTIVARIABLE-CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- $\iint_{S} F.\eta dA$ where $F = [3x^2 , y^2 , 0]$ and $S : r(u,v) = [u,v,2u+3v]$
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- Prove all tangent plane to the cone $x^2+y^2=z^2$ goes through the origin
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Find the directional derivative in the point $p$ in the direction $\vec{pp'}$
- Check if $\phi$ is convex
- Define in which points function is continuous
Related Questions in GAME-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Perfect Information Game and Chance node
- Valid operations to the value of a matrix game
- Rook Game Problem Solving
- Proof of Axiom of Transparency in Aumman's model of knowledge
- Sion's MinMax theorem over matrices
- Can Zermelo's theorem be extended to a game which always has a winner?
- a risk lover agent behave as if risk natural.
- How to prove that a strategy profile is a Proper Equilibrium?
Related Questions in NASH-EQUILIBRIUM
- Difference between SPE and SPNE in Game Theory
- When we get a new equilibrium by crossing strategies of two other equilibria?
- A Theorem concerning Regret and Nash Equilibrium
- How does best response imply indifference?
- Finding the optimal value of a function with multiple variables.
- Mixed Nash Equilibria and Negative Probability
- Game Theory : Eliminating weakly dominated strategies
- Extending the "guess 2/3 of average" game to “guess of average" game
- Does a $3 \times 3$ zero-sum game with a pure equilibrium point always have a dominated strategy?
- How can I approximately solve a 2-player zero-sum game by subselecting its rows/columns?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The partial derivative $\frac{\partial p_1}{\partial x_2}$ gives exactly what you might think: the change in player 1's payoff as player 2 changes their strategy. If this is zero, then player 1 will be indifferent to infinitesimal changes in player 2's strategy. If it is also true that player 1 is in a local payoff maximum (i.e. $\frac{\partial p_1}{\partial x_1}=0$ then, up to first order, a change in player 2's strategy will not be met by a corresponding change in player 1's strategy.