I'm looking for an example a measurable function that does not map a set of measure zero to a set of measure zero. (we are discussing absolutely continuous functions in class, and the fact that they map sets of measure zero to sets of measure zero)
2026-03-28 06:40:47.1774680047
Measurable function that does not map a set of measure zero to a set of measure zero
883 Views Asked by user641658 https://math.techqa.club/user/user641658/detail At
2
Consider the standard Cantor set $C$. We know that the Cantor set can be thought of as real numbers in $[0,1]$ expressed in base $3$ with no digit equal to $1$ and it is an easy exercise to prove that it has measure $0$. Anyway, as said before, any element in the Cantor set can be written as
$$x = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{a_n}{3^n}, \text{ where } a_n=0,2 \hspace{10px}(\forall n\in \mathbb{N})$$
Define $f: [0,1] \to [0,1]$ as follows:
Since the elements of the Cantor set have no $1$'s, elements of the Cantor set are never truncated at step II. So, if $0.a_1a_2a_3\cdots$ is a number in $C$, the result of the function will be something like $0.b_1b_2b_3\cdots$ where $b_n = \frac{a_n}{2}$. This means that given a number in $y$ in $[0,1]$, we can first write down its binary expansion $y=0.c_1c_2c_3\cdots$ and then see that $x=(2c_1)(2c_2)(2c_3)\cdots$ is mapped to $y$, i.e. $f(x)=y$. This shows that $f$ maps the Cantor set onto $[0,1]$ and hence, $f$ maps a set with Lebesgue measure $0$ to a set of Lebesgue measure $1$. Q.E.D.
By the way, the function $f$ constructed above is called the Devil's staircase or the Cantor function sometimes and it is an important function for constructing counterexamples in measure theory.