Suppose $L/K$ is a finite extension of fields. Is is always true that $$\min_{\substack{\{\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n\} \\ L = K(\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n)}} \left(\prod_{i=1}^n [K(\alpha_i): K] \right) = [L:K]?$$ By the primitive element theorem, this is certainly true if $L/K$ is separable. But what if $L/K$ is an arbitrary finite extension?
2026-05-06 04:18:45.1778041125
Minimum product of degrees of generators of finite field extension
453 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in NUMBER-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Show that $(x,y,z)$ is a primitive Pythagorean triple then either $x$ or $y$ is divisible by $3$.
- About polynomial value being perfect power.
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- What is the smallest integer $N>2$, such that $x^5+y^5 = N$ has a rational solution?
- Integer from base 10 to base 2
- How do I show that any natural number of this expression is a natural linear combination?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
Related Questions in FIELD-THEORY
- Square classes of a real closed field
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Proving addition is associative in $\mathbb{R}$
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible for an infinite field that does not contain a subfield isomorphic to $\Bbb Q$?
- Proving that the fraction field of a $k[x,y]/(f)$ is isomorphic to $k(t)$
- Finding a generator of GF(16)*
- Operator notation for arbitrary fields
- Studying the $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ when $p(x)$ is any degree.
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
Related Questions in GALOIS-THEORY
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- A weird automorphism
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Prove that K/L is a Galois extension
- discriminant and irreducibility of $x^p - (p+1)x - 1$
- galois group of irreducible monic cubic polynomial
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
- Regular inverse Galois problem for Q(t)
- When a certain subfield of $\mathbb{C}(x,y^2)$ is Galois
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
OP told me via personal communication that his motivation for this question was to find a proof of$$|\text{Aut}(L/K)| \le [L: K]$$for all finite extensions $L/K$ without invoking linear independence of automorphisms. Indeed, there is such a proof—an easy one just using induction on the number of generators one needs, replacing, for each $i$, both $K$'s in $[K(\alpha_i): K]$ by $K(\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_{i - 1})$. Then the product is clearly equal to $[L:K]$, and the rest of the proof is plain sailing.
As pointed out in the MathOverflow version of the question here, a paper of Sweedler here seems to suggest the condition$$\min_{\substack{\{\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n\} \\ L = K(\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n)}} \left(\prod_{i=1}^n [K(\alpha_i): K] \right) = [L:K]$$does not hold in general for purely inseparable extensions, and as such, OP asks for an explicit counterexample.
Unfortunately, I am not a specialist in inseparable extensions. I would try hunting for the fabled counterexample in the following way. Start from a field $K$ of characteristic $p > 0$ for which $[K: K^p]$ is "large enough" (here $K^p = \{x^p : x \in K\}$)—infinity would probably do, $1$ or $p$ won't, $p^2$ seems risky. Take $E$ purely inseparable of degree $p$ over $K$. Construct $L$ purely inseparable of degree $p^2$ over $E$ such that $L^p \subset E$ (so that $L$ has no primitive element over $E$) and such that $L^p \cap K = E^p$. I am not sure (yet) how to make such an $L$, but I am pretty sure it can be done, also for some quite explicit fields $K \subset E$; if necessary, I would invoke Jacobson-Bourbaki theory on intermediate extensions of $E \subset L$—a theory I've never heard of until I started searching around on Google a few hours ago. Anyway, once one has such an $L$, then each $\alpha$ in $L$ that is not in $K$ has degree $p^2$ over $K$, and at least two such $\alpha$'s are needed, so that $L$ would give the desired example.
Maybe you can close the gap in this argument.