In Rowsen's Discrete Mathematics text, 6th edition. He has this problem as an example (#11) on page 190. His solution for obtaining a lower bound is to ignore the first half of the terms. He does the following:
\begin{align} &1:&1 + 2 + 3 ... + n &>= [n/2] + ([n/2] + 1) + ... + n \\ &2:&&>= [n/2] + [n/2] + ... + [n/2] \\ &3:&&\space\space\space= (n - [n/2] + 1)[n/2] \\ &4:&&>= (n/2)(n/2) \\ &5:&&\space\space\space= n^2/4 \\ \end{align}
So the answer is $\Theta(n^2)$. That I get, but how does one arrive to the simplification in line 2 and 4 (these appear similar to me, seems it includes as dropping the one for some reason). Also how is line 3 obtained? The algebra evades me here.
It might be easier to think of the problem visually and separately for even $n\;(=2m)$ and odd $n\;(=2m+1)$. In both cases, $m=[n/2]$ and also, for even $n$, $m=n/2$.
(1) $n=2m$ (even):
$$\begin{align} 1+2+3+\qquad\cdots\qquad +&[n/2]+([n/2]+1)+\quad\cdots\quad +n\\\\ =1+2+3+\cdots+(m-1)+ &m+(m+1)+(m+2)+\cdots+2m\\\\ >= &m+(m+1)+(m+2)+\cdots+2m&&\cdots(1)\\ >= &\overbrace{m+m+\qquad m+\qquad \cdots+m}^{2m-m+1\text{ of them}}&&\cdots(2)\\\\ = &(2m-m+1)\cdot m=\color{lightgray}{(m+1)\cdot m}&&\cdots(3)\\\\ >=&\left(\frac n2\right)\left(\frac n2\right)&&\cdots(4)\\\\ =&\frac{n^2}4&&\cdots(5) \end{align}$$
Note: $(3)=(m+1)m=(\frac n2+1)(\frac n2)\ge (\frac n2)^2=(4)$
(2) $n=2m+1$ (odd):
$$\begin{align} 1+2+3+\qquad\cdots\qquad +&[n/2]+([n/2]+1)+\quad\cdots\quad \qquad+n\\\\ =1+2+3+\cdots+(m-1)+ &m+(m+1)+(m+2)+\cdots+2m+(2m+1)\\\\ >= &m+(m+1)+(m+2)+\cdots+2m+(2m+1)&&\cdots(1)\\ >= &\overbrace{m+m+\qquad m+\qquad \;\cdots+m+\quad+m}^{(2m+1)-m+1\text{ of them}}&&\cdots(2)\\\\ = &((2m+1)-m+1)\cdot m=\color{lightgray}{(m+2)\cdot m}&&\cdots(3)\\\\ >=&\left(\frac n2\right)\left(\frac n2\right)&&\cdots(4)\\\\ =&\frac{n^2}4&&\cdots(5)\ \end{align}$$
Note: $(3)=(m+2)\cdot m=(\frac {n-1}2+2)(\frac{n-1}2)=\frac{(n+3)(n-1)}4=\frac{n^2+2n-3}4>\frac{n^2}4=(\frac n2)^2=(4)$