Apparently, it is known that there are isomorphisms $$\mathrm{Hom}_R(A,\prod_{i \in I} B_i)\cong\prod_{i \in I} \mathrm{Hom}_R(A, B_i)$$ and $$\mathrm{Hom}_R(\bigoplus_{i \in I} A_i, B)\cong\prod_{i \in I}\mathrm{Hom}_R(A_i,B)$$ which are said to be natural. However, I'm not sure what it means for them to be natural. Generally, a naturality means an existence of a certain natural transformation between two functors. I wonder what are the functors in question are here.
2025-01-13 05:57:59.1736747879
Naturality of certain isomorphisms for $\mathrm{Hom}$-functors
53 Views Asked by Jxt921 https://math.techqa.club/user/jxt921/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Projective Indecomposable modules of quiver algebra
- Binary relations for Cobb-Douglas
- Relations among these polynomials
- Number of necklaces of 16 beads with 8 red beads, 4 green beads and 4 yellow beads
- Page 99 of Hindry's Arithmetics, follows from exact sequence that $\text{N}(IJ) = \text{N}(J)\text{card}(J/IJ)$?
- How to write the identity permutation as a product of transpositions
- Is $H$ a subgroup?
- $x=(0,\overline{1})$ and $y=(0,\overline{2})$ generate the same ideal in $R=\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}/5\mathbb{Z}$
- Having some problems with understanding conics and graphing (eccentricity)
- Is this Cayley Diagram contradictory?
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- Are there right-deformations for abelian sheaves?
- Category Theory compared with Meta-Grammars (or Hyper-Grammars) in Programming Languages
- over categories of a morphism?
- Epimorphic morphisms of sheaves
- Finite Limits, Exponentiation and Sub-Object Classifiers imply Finite Co-Limits
- What is a nice "naturally occurring" example of an arrow category?
- $G$-sets, natural correspondence?
- Finitely generated iff direct limits of subobjects are bounded by subobjects
- Is there a different term for the "left-regular representation" of categories?
- Category theory: Are all composable arrows actually arrows?
Related Questions in HOMOLOGICAL-ALGEBRA
- Are there right-deformations for abelian sheaves?
- Obstruction to be conjugated by an automorphism for subgroups of an abelian group
- Galois cohomologies of an elliptic curve
- Generalization for Leray Hirsch theorem for Principal $G$-bundle
- Projective resolutions of modules in a short exact sequence (Dummit & Foote Proposition 17.1.7)
- Quasi isomorphism and pullback
- Can we produce a long exact sequence in cohomology from more than just short exact sequences?
- Affine smooth variety has only trivial first-order deformations
- What is an additive functor?
- Compute $\text{Tor}^R_n(M,M)$ in the following specific case.
Related Questions in NATURAL-TRANSFORMATIONS
- Why unnatural isomorphisms are not mathematically well- behaved?
- Natural transformation induced by adjoint functors.
- Trouble understanding what a natural transformation is
- Extension of Scalars is a pseudofunctor
- Riehl's Category Theory in Context - Exercise 1.5.vii without Axiom of Choice
- Not all Monads are Idempotent, a Cautionary Tale on Natural Transformations
- Naturality of certain isomorphisms for $\mathrm{Hom}$-functors
- Cisinski, Higher Categories and Homotopical Algebra, Theorem 1.1.10
- Describing a natural transformation in terms of hom-sets.
- Natural transformations as categorical homotopies
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
The functors in question are
$$ A \mapsto \mathrm{Hom}_R(A,\prod_{i \in I} B_i) $$
and
$$ A \mapsto \prod_{i \in I} \mathrm{Hom}_R(A, B_i) $$
and similarly for the other case.
We can do a little exploration to see how these functors act on morphisms. The first functor is just the usual (contravariant) $\mathrm{Hom}$ functor. If we have a map $f: A \to A'$, we get a map $\mathrm{Hom}_R(A',\prod_{i \in I} B_i) \to \mathrm{Hom}_R(A,\prod_{i \in I} B_i)$ via precomposition: $g \mapsto g \circ f$.
For the second functor, it helps to have a more categorical description of the product (in the category of sets). It turns out that the product of a collection of sets $(X_i)_{i \in I}$ is the same as a certain natural transformation. Letting $\mathcal{I}$ be the discrete category (no non-identity morphisms) on the set $I$, we can define two functors $\mathcal{I} \to \mathcal{Set}$. The first is the constant functor $\Delta_1 = (i \mapsto 1)$ (where $1$ is the set with one element). The second is $X_\_ = (i \mapsto X_i)$. You can check that the product of the $X_i$ is the same as a natural transformation from $\Delta_1$ to $X_\_$ (note that naturality is easy since $\mathcal{I}$ doesn't have any non-identity morphisms).
So the second functor is $A \mapsto \mathcal{Nat}(\Delta_1, i \mapsto \mathrm{Hom}(A, B_i))$. $\mathcal{Nat}$ is just a specific kind of $\mathrm{Hom}$ functor, so we just need to compose two different functors. If we have a map $f: A \to A'$, we get a map $\mathcal{Nat}(\Delta_1, i \mapsto \mathrm{Hom}(A', B_i)) \to \mathcal{Nat}(\Delta_1, i \mapsto \mathrm{Hom}(A, B_i))$ via pre- and post-composition: $\alpha \mapsto (g \mapsto g \circ f) \circ \alpha$. That is, we compose the precomposition natural transformation $g \mapsto g \circ f$ with $\alpha$.
Alternatively, you could work with the universal property of products directly to organize all the maps $\mathrm{Hom}(A', B_i) \to \mathrm{Hom}(A, B_i)$ into a single map $\prod_{i \in I} \mathrm{Hom}(A', B_i) \to \prod_{i \in I} \mathrm{Hom}(A, B_i)$
You should check that all the functor laws are satisfied. Both of these functors are contravariant, so it makes sense to ask if they're naturally isomorphic.