On The Horizontal And Slanted Asymptotes Of Rational Functions

356 Views Asked by At

I am really confused about the horizontal and slant asymptotes of a function. My textbook says that given a rational function:

\begin{equation} y=f(x)=\frac{a_{n}x^{n}+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdot\cdot\cdot+a_0}{b_{m}x^{m}+b_{m-1}x^{m-1}+\cdot\cdot\cdot+b_0} \end{equation}

The following properties are true. Can you please explain to me why the following properties are true? Do so not too rigorously, I'm still a beginner. And can you not use Calculus in the answers, since I haven't learn it yet? The properties are:

  1. If $n < m$, then $y=0$ is a horizontal asymptote. I don't get why it would not be possible for 0 to be in the range of a rational function. Sure, a rational function like $\frac{1}{x}$ cannot produce 0. But how can this be true for all rational functions such that when $n < m$, it can't give an output of $0$? Please explain.

  2. If $n>m$, there is no horizontal asymptote. Please explain to me why there would be no limit to what the function can produce.

  3. If $n=m$, then $y=\frac{a_{n}}{b_{m}}$ is a horizontal asymptote. Again, I have no idea why this holds true for all rational functions. Can someone please explain?

  4. If $n$ is more than $m$ only by $1$ degree, then there is a slant asymptote which can be determined by dividing the denominator into the numerator. Again, can someone please explain?

Thank you so much in advance. Again, please try not to use calculus in your answers.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

1
On

(1) $0$ can be both an asymptotic value and in the range. They're unrelated. Consider $$f(x) = \frac{x}{x^2+1}$$ Certainly $f(0)=0$, but also $\lim\limits_{x\to\pm\infty}f(x)=0$.

(2) By performing polynomial division, such a function can be written in the form $$f(x) = p(x) + \frac{r(x)}{s(x)}$$ where $p$ is a polynomial of positive degree and $r$ and $s$ are polynomials of the form in (1). The polynomial part grows without bound as $x\to\pm\infty$, and $r/s$ tends to $0$ as in (1).

(3) Same argument as in (2), but here $p(x)$ is a polynomial of degree $0$ (constant).

(4) Again as in (1), but $p(x)$ is now a polynomial of degree $1$ (a nonhorizontal line).

8
On

The main result used head, in addition of Euclidean division of polynomials, t is that the limit of a rational function at $\infty$ is the limit of the ratio of the leading terms of the numerator and denominator, i.e. with your notations: $$\lim_{x\to\pm \infty} f(x)=\lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{a_nx^n} {b_mx^m}=\begin{cases}\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{a_n} {b_mx^{m-n}}=0&\text{if }\:m>n,\\[0.5ex] \dfrac{a_n}{b_m}&\text{if }\:m=n,\\[0.5ex] \displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{a_n} {b_m}x^{n-m}=\infty&\text{if }\:m>n.\end{cases} $$

For the oblique asymptote, if $f(x)=\dfrac{g(x)}{h(x)}$, divide the numerator by the denominator: you obtain polynomials $q(x), \:r(x)$ such that $$g(x)=h(x)\,q(x)+r(x) \qquad r(x)=0~\text{ or }~\deg r <\deg h,$$ whence $$f(x)=q(x)+\frac{r(x)}{h(x)}, \quad\text{so }~f(x)-q(x)=\frac{r(x)}{h(x)}\to 0\quad\text{as }\: x\to\infty.$$

In this case we say the polynomial curve $y=q(x)$ is asymptote to the given rational curve $y=f(x)$.

In particular, if $\deg g=1+\deg h$, then $\deg r=1$ and the curve $y=r(x)$ is a straightline – which is called an oblique asymptote to the curve $y=f(x)$