http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Cone.html shows the parametric and implicit representation of a cone, I am wondering what the equation would look like if we also consider the bottom circle face for the cone.
2026-03-30 13:20:59.1774876859
Parametric and implicit representation of a cone
7.4k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in SOLID-GEOMETRY
- Looking for hints on the below 3D geometry problem.
- What are the tangent planes of the sphere B, which contains the line L?
- What is the name of the polyhedral shape of the Humanity Star?
- Point to line distance in 3D?
- Joining the centers of the edges of Platonic solids
- Geometry of a d10
- Question about parametric, implicit equation and vector equation
- Finding a vector perpendicular to a given vector in 3 dimensional space
- Compute the dihedral angle of a regular pyramid
- Intuition of angle between two planes
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Implicit form
More than one equation
The formula you refer to seems to be the following:
This is only a single euation, and as such, it describes the cone extended to infinity. Points below the base will be part of that cone, as will be points above the apex, where it continues symmetrically. To restrict this formulation to the cone from base circle to apex, you have to add the inequality
$$0 \leq z \leq z_0$$
So even for the “simple” cone, you need more than a single equation.
Adding the circle
Now let's add the circle. There is an easy trick to formulate that either of two conditions must be satisfied: rephrase the equations so that the right hand sides becomes zero, then multiply them. A product is zero if and only if any of its factors is zero. In this case you obtain the equation
$$\left(\frac{x^2+y^2}{c^2}-(z-z_0)^2\right)z = 0$$
which describes the fact that a point lies either on the cone or in the $z=0$ plane.
Add to that an inequality which restructs the portion of the plane to the circle:
$$ x^2 + y^2 \leq r^2 $$
and you are done. You could even omit half of the inequality given above, and only require
$$ z \leq z_0 $$
as this will omit the mirror image above the apex, while the first inequality will restrict your set of points to the an infinite cylinder which will exclude the parts of the infinite cone that lie below the $z=0$ plane.
Parametric form
When you want to use a single parameter to describe parts of two algebraic surfaces which join in a non-smooth way, you cannot do this with smooth functions. For this reason, you will have to use a case distinction at some point. One possible way would be to use absolute values like this:
\begin{align*} z &= \frac{u + \lvert u\rvert}{2} \\ x &= \frac{h-\lvert u\rvert}{h}r\cos\theta \\ y &= \frac{h-\lvert u\rvert}{h}r\sin\theta \\ u &\in [-h, h]\quad\theta\in[0, 2\pi) \end{align*}
Now different values of $u$ will correspond to different circles. The first half of the way, for negative $u$, radii increase while $z$ stays at zero to form the disc, while for positive $u$ the radii will decrease while $z$ increases to form the cone.
The formula for $z$ might also have been written as
$$z=\begin{cases}u&\text{if }u>0\\0&\text{else}\end{cases}$$
Which is more explicit but doesn't fit the other formulas as well as the above formulation.