Consider two points $a, b \in \mathbb{R}^2$. Then from elementary geometry, the set of points that are equidistant from both $a$ and $b$ is precisely the perpendicular bisector of the line segment $ab$. Now suppose we put some other metric on $\mathbb{R}^2$ that generates the standard topology. Then what can we say about the set of points that are equidistant from $a$ and $b$? Intuitively, it seems to me that this set should be "one-dimensional" and cannot contain an open set. Is this true?
2026-05-05 19:29:00.1778009340
Perpendicular bisector in a different metric
294 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Very interesting question!
Metrics
For an arbitrary metric on $\mathbb{R}^2$ that generates the Euclidean topology, the set of all points equidistant from $2$ distinct points does not necessarily have to be "one-dimensional".
Consider the metric $d(p,q)=\min\{\|p-q\|_2,1\}$ where $\|(x,y)\|_2=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ is the Euclidean norm. Do convince yourself that this is a metric. (non-negative, non-degenerate, symmetric, triangle inequality) However, for any two points, there is only a bounded (in the sense of the Euclidean metric) set of points that are not equidistant from them.
Norms
Even if we require our metric to be induced from a norm, the set of equidistant points does not have to be "one-dimensional".
Consider the norm $\|(x,y)\|_\infty=\max\{|x|,|y|\}$. Do convince yourself that this is a norm. (non-negative, non-degenerate, scaling, triangle inequality) However, if we take the points $(1,0)$ and $(-1,0)$ then all points $(x,y)$ with $1-y\leq x\leq y-1$ are equidistant from $p$ and $q$.
Strictly convex norms
However, if we require our metric to be induced from a strictly convex norm, then we can prove that the set of equidistant points is homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$. Strictly convex means there is no line segment in the unit sphere. Algebraically, for all $p\neq q$ with $\|p\|=\|q\|=1$ we have $\|p+q\|<2$. Examples of strictly convex norms are all $p$-norms for $1<p<\infty$.
Proof (Not very rigorous, but hopefully convincing enough.)
Let $\|\cdot\|$ be a strictly convex norm on $\mathbb{R}^2$ and let $p\neq q\in\mathbb{R}^2$. Define $s:=\|p-q\|$.
Claim 1 For all $r\geq\frac{s}2$ on each side (non-strict) of the line through $p$ and $q$ there is exactly one point equidistant from $p$ and $q$ with distance $r$.
Proof of Claim 1 Assume for the contrary that there are two distinct points $a$ and $b$ to the right of the line through $p$ and $q$, both equidistant from $p$ and $q$ with the same distance $r$. We then find that all of the points $p-a$, $p-b$, $q-a$ and $q-b$ and their inverses lie in the sphere of radius $r$. However, all of the line segments $(p-a)(p-b)$, $(q-a)(q-b)$, $(b-p)(a-p)$ and $(b-q)(b-q)$ are different, are parallel, and have the same length. We are forced to conclude there is a line segment inside the sphere of radius $r$. This proves Claim 1.
Notice that from the triangle inequality it follows that for $r<\frac{s}2$ there are no equidistant points from $p$ and $q$ with distance $r$. Also notice that there is a unique point on the line through $p$ and $q$ equidistant from $p$ and $q$, namely $\frac{p+q}2$ with distance $\frac{s}2$. It follows that we can define a bijection $f:\mathbb{R}\to E$, where $E$ is the set of points equidistant from $p$ and $q$. Namely $f(0)=\frac{p+q}2$, $f(t>0)$ is the unique point on the right of the line through $p$ and $q$ equidistant from $p$ and $q$ with distance $\frac{s}2+t$, and $f(t<0)$ is the unique point to the left of the line through $p$ and $q$ equidistant from $p$ and $q$ with distance $\frac{s}2-t$.
I don't quite have an idea how you can rigorously prove that $f$ is continuous both ways, but this is my intuition. Since the norm is strictly convex, for all $\epsilon>0$ the spheres around $p$ and $q$ through the current equidistant point curve away from each other some $\delta>0$ units. Then changing the radius by $\delta$ can only move the intersection of the spheres $\epsilon$ units.
Final notes
Finally, I want to emphasise how important this strict convexity is. If the norm is not strictly convex, then you can always find two points $p$ and $q$ for which the equidistance space is not "one-dimensional". Just take the end points of the line segment in the unit sphere.