Here is Prob. 1, Sec. 25, in the book Topology by James R. Munkres, 2nd edition:
What are the components and the path components of $\mathbb{R}_l$? What are the continuous maps $f \colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}_l$?
My Attempt:
First of all, we note that $\mathbb{R}_l$ denotes the set of real numbers with the topology having as a basis all the open intervals of the form $(a, b) = \{ \ x \in \mathbb{R} \ \colon \ a < x < b \ \}$, where $a$ and $b$ are any real numbers such that $a<b$, and all the closed-open intervals $[c, d) = \{ c \} \cup (c, d)$, where $c$ and $d$ are any real numbers such that $c < d$. Refer to Sec. 13 in Munkres.
Now let $A$ be a set in $\mathbb{R}_l$ consisting of more than one points. Let $a, b \in A$ such that $a < b$. Then $a \in (-\infty, b)$ and $b \in [b, +\infty)$; these two rays are disjoint and their union is all of $\mathbb{R}$; moreover these rays are open in $\mathbb{R}_l$. So $A \cap (-\infty, b)$ and $A \cap [b, +\infty)$ is a separation of $A$. Thus $A$ is not connnected.
Thus we have shown that every set of real numbers having more than one point fails to be connected in $\mathbb{R}_l$. In other words, the only nonempty connected sets in $\mathbb{R}_l$ are the singleton sets of real numbers.
Since each component of $\mathbb{R}_l$ must be connected [Refer to Theorem 25.1 in Munkres.], we can conclude from the preceding paragraph that each component of $\mathbb{R}_l$ is a singleton set.
And, since each path component of $\mathbb{R}_l$ must be contained in a component [Refer to Theorem 25.5 in Munkres.], we can conclude from the preceding paragraph that each path component of $\mathbb{R}_l$ must be a singleton set too.
Finally let the map $f \colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}_l$ be continuous. Then since $\mathbb{R}$ is connected, so should be $f ( \mathbb{R})$ [Refer to Theorem 23.5 in Munkres.], and therefore $f ( \mathbb{R})$ must be a singleton set in $\mathbb{R}_l$. This shows that $f$ is constant.
Is this solution correct? If so, is it clear enough too, especially for a beginning student? If not, then where are the issues?
Your solution is clear and accurate. Well-done!
This may just be a typo on your part, and if it is then I apologise for nitpicking, but the sentence
should instead read
Apart from this, I have no comments for improvement.