I have trouble understanding the geometric idea behind a projective basis. So for example in $\mathbb{P}^2(K)$ we have $[1:0:0],[0:1:0],[0:0:1], [1:1:1]$ but why? I know that $$ [1:0:0] = k\cdot \vec{e_1} $$ then we have four lines. Why is there $[1:1:1]$? Isnt this a linear combination of the other ones? A very brief explanation would be enough. I really have no clue why there is always an extra vector or "line".
2026-04-08 01:12:53.1775610773
Projective Basis Explanation, Visualisation
58 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in PROJECTIVE-GEOMETRY
- Visualization of Projective Space
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
- Determining the true shape of a section.
- Do projective transforms preserve circle centres?
- why images are related by an affine transformation in following specific case?(background in computer vision required)
- Calculating the polar of a given pole relative to a conic (with NO Calculus)
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Conic in projective plane isomorphic to projective line
- Noether normalization lemma
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In projective geometry you cannot talk of a linear combination. Also, the idea that dimension corresponds to the number of elements in the basis is something you should get rid of when talking about projective geometry. So why do we have four points in a basis for a two-dimensional projective space? (Or $n + 2$ points in a basis for $\mathbb{P}^n K$?)
This idea arises when we're trying to fix a projective transformation. Let $[x], [y]$ and $[z]$ be three points in the projective space, and $x, y, z$ linearly independent in $K^3$ and suppose that $\varphi = [A]$ is a projective transformation on $\mathbb{P}^2 K$ (with $A$ a $3 \times 3$ matrix -- or linear transformation, if you want -- over $K$) such that $\varphi([1:0:0]) = [x]$, $\varphi([0:1:0]) = [y]$ and $\varphi([0:0:1]) = [z]$.
To make this example easier, I'll suppose $x = (0,1,0), y = (0,0,1), z = (1,0,0)$, but notice that the following argument would work for any three independent vectors. Then we have $A(1,0,0) = \lambda (0,1,0)$ for some $\lambda \in K_{\neq 0}$. Similarly we find $\mu, \nu \neq 0$ such that $$\varphi = [A] = [\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & \nu \\ \lambda & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \mu & 0 \end{pmatrix} ] = [\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \lambda/\nu & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \mu/\nu & 0 \end{pmatrix} ].$$ Notice that this "basis" DOES NOT uniquely define $\varphi$ (we still have two "degrees of freedom" left!). This is not what we want, so we throw in another vector $(1,1,1)$ so that any three vectors are lineairly independent, and the same for our basis of images. Say, $\varphi([1:1:1]) = [2:3:4].$ (For the sake of example, but this fourth vector should be such that any three vectors in our basis are LI.) Then, $$A(1,1,1) = \xi (2,3,4) \iff \nu = 2\xi, \lambda = 3\xi, \mu = 4 \xi$$ for some $\xi \neq 0$, and this DOES fix our projective transformation: $$\varphi = [A] = [\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 2 \\ 3 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 4 & 0 \end{pmatrix} ],$$ and this is exactly what we want from our basis: it's the smallest number of points such that a transformation is uniquely determined on them.