Let $M,N$ are $R$-modules and $P^\bullet, Q^\bullet$ are their projective resolutions. Can we obtain a projective resolution of $M\otimes N$ using $P^\bullet, Q^\bullet$? If I understand correctly the homology groups of $P^\bullet\otimes Q^\bullet$ are $\mathrm{Tor}(M,N)$ so it's not a projective resolution.
2026-03-29 16:19:06.1774801146
Projective resolution of tensor product
2.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in HOMOLOGICAL-ALGEBRA
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- $A$ - dga over field, then $H^i(A) = 0, i > 1$ implies $HH_i(A) = 0, i < -1$
- Tensor product $M\otimes_B Hom_B(M,B)$ equals $End_B(M)$, $M$ finitely generated over $B$ and projective
- Group cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}(V)$
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- Existence of adjugant with making given natural transformation be the counit
- Noetherian property is redundant?
- What is the monomorphism that forms the homology group?
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Related Questions in PROJECTIVE-MODULE
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Flat modules over a PID
- Projectivity of a module
- Proving a module is projective.
- Proving a specific module is projective.
- $M\otimes_A N\cong A$ implies $M$ is left $A$-projective?
- Proof of equivalence of two definitions of a projective module
- Problem based on Projective and Injective Module
- Splitting two exact sequences in a compatible way
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There is a lot going on in your question, so I'll try and address it piece by piece. Lets work over a commutative ring so I dont need to be careful.
$Tor(M,N)$ is a bifunctor, and can be calculated as you probably know, by projective resolutions of $M$ or $N$, tensoring appropriately, and then taking the homology. However what you have described (taking a tensor product of complexes) is the proof of such a statement.
The tensor compled $P^*\otimes Q^*$ is a massive double complex. Depending on your familiarity with spectral sequences, it takes some or a lot of work, to show that since the rows of this double complex are exact, taking homology yields precisely $Tor(M,N)$. However, notice that this does not say that the tensor product complex is not projective or acyclic. Just as when you take a projective resolution, tensor and take homology, "philosophically" you are always left with at least one nonzero homology group (only the higher ones vanish in some cases), namely $Tor_0$ of what you want to calculate, in the case of a double complex, the $P^i$ and $Q^j$ dont contribute their own homology, so you dont need to worry that you're calculating stuff you dont want to.
Now to your actual question: Tensor product of flat objects remain flat. The tensor product of free things remains free (work this out!). The tensor product of projective objects, hence also remains projective!
This all bodes well for us. So now, we have a monstrous double complex, and we want to resolve the object $M\otimes N$. It doesnt quite make sense to say that "the double complex resolves $M\otimes N$", but its not far from the truth: take the total complex of this double complex. That is, direct sum up the objects of a given total degree and form a complex. To make it into a complex you have to be a bit careful: use the sign trick to correct the differentials (see here for instance) and get a complex. This complex is exact (work this out by hand, or use Kunneth). And each of the objects are projective.