Proof by pigeon hole principle.

144 Views Asked by At

I've been practicing discrete math recently and I'm stuck on this problem. Could someone help me with this, give me some hint or direction? I figured it was the pigeonhole principle, but I can't figure out the boxes. The content of the task is as follows:

Prove that among $15$ distinct natural numbers not exceeding 100, there are four numbers $a,\ b,\ c,\ d$ such that: $a + b = c + d$ or the numbers $a, b, c$ form an arithmetic sequence.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

Proof by contradiction: If none of any adjacent or non-adjacent gaps are equal, then we arrange the 15 numbers $a_1, a_2, ..., a_{15}$ acsendingly, and start from the smallest gap between some adjacent pair, for example, $\delta_1=a_i-a_j$, so we have $\delta_1\ge 1$, then $\delta_2\ge 2, ..., \delta_{14}\ge14$, but the sum of the gaps:

$$\sum\ge 1+2+...+14=105$$

which is impossible.

=============== To make it clear============

Suppose you pick up 15 numbers and arrange them acendingly, and you get $1, 5, 11, 24, 25, ...$,

then we have $\delta_1=25-24=1\ge1, \delta_2=5-1=4\ge2, \delta_3=11-5=6\ge3, ...$

0
On

Write the numbers $a_1,a_2,\ldots, a_{15}$ in increasing order. Let $b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_{14}$ be the natural numbers satisfying $b_i = a_{i+1}-a_i$. Then by the fact that the $a_i$s are distinct and increasing in $i$, it follows that each $b_i$ is positive but not necessarily distinct [in fact we will establish via Case 2 that the the upper bound of $100$ on the $a_i$s implies that $b_i$s are necessarily not distinct]. Thus we break down into $2$ cases:

Case 1: The $b_i$s are not distinct; equivalently, there exist distinct $i_1,i_2$ such that the equation $b_{i_1}=b_{i_2}$ holds. Assume without loss of generality $i_2>i_1$. Then the equation $b_{i_1}=b_{i_2}$ gives the equation $b_{i_1}=a_{i_1+1}-a_i = a_{i_2+1}-a_{i_2}=b_{i_2}$. If the equation $i_2=i_1+1$ holds, then the equation $a_{i_1+1}-a_i = a_{i_2+1}-a_{i_2}$ implies the equation $a_{i_1+1}-a_i = a_{i_1+2}-a_{i_1+1}$ so $a_{i_1},a_{i_1+1},a_{i_1+2}$ form an arithmetic sequence. Otherwise the equation $a_{i_1+1}-a_i = a_{i_2+1}-a_{i_2}$ imply the equation $a_{i_2+1}+a_i=a_{i_1+1}+a_{i_2}$, with $i_1,i_1+1,i_2,i_2+1$ distinct.

Case 2: There does not exist such integers $i_1,i_2$ as in Case 1; equivalently, the $b_i$'s are distinct. Then as the $b_i$s are each distinct positive integers, it follows that $a_{15}$ satisfies the following: $$a_{15} \ = \ a_1+\sum_{i=1}^{14} b_i$$ $$\ge \ a_1 + \sum_{i=1}^{14} i \ > \ 1+ 100.$$

You can finish from here, and see that Case 2 cannot be.