Please help prove the following proposition: Proposition 3.14 Supplementary angles of congruent angles are congruent.
Is this right? (1) Suppose angle ABC is congruent to angle DEF (given) (2) We have arbitrary points A, C, and G on the sides of angle ABC, and the supplement angle CBG of angle ABC. We can choose points D, F, and H such that AB≅DE,CB≅FE,and BG≅EH. (C-1) (3) Triangle ABC is congruent to triangle DEF (C-6) (4) So AC≅DF and ∡A≅∡D. (def cong triangles) (5) Also AG≅DH (C-3) (6) So triangle ACG is congruent to triangle DFH (C-6 SAS) (7) So CG≅FH and angle G ≅angle H (def cong triangles) (8) So triangle CBD is cong to triangle FEH (C-6 SAS) (9) Then angle CBG is congruent to angle FEH (def cong triangles)
That's overly complicated! Why are you inventing so many unnecessary things? You have four angles. You don't need anything else.
Given: $\angle A \cong \angle B$. $\angle C$ is supplementary to $\angle A$. $\angle D$ is supplementary to $\angle B$.
Pf: 1)$m\angle A = m\angle B$ (def of congruent)
2)$m\angle A + m \angle C = 180$ (def of supplementary)
3)$m\angle D + m \angle B = 180$ (def of supplementary)
The rest is algebra: