Prove p, assuming the following:
- (1) r → ¬q assumption
- (2) q assumption
- (3) ¬(p ∧ ¬s) ∧ (¬r → p) assumption
I need help after (4) not sure how to start this
(4) q → ¬r contrapostion (1)
(5)¬r modus ponens (2),(4)
(6)
(7)
Prove p, assuming the following:
I need help after (4) not sure how to start this
(4) q → ¬r contrapostion (1)
(5)¬r modus ponens (2),(4)
(6)
(7)
Prove p, assuming the following:
(1) r → ¬q assumption (2) q assumption (3) ¬(p ∧ ¬s) ∧ (¬r → p) assumption I need help after (4) not sure how to start this (4) q → ¬r contrapostion (1) (5)¬r modus ponens (2),(4) (6) p Modus ponens (3),(4) I figured it out!