Exercise Prove that $f(x) = \displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{x^2}{x^3+n^3}$ is continuous on $[0,\infty)$
I am wondering if there is a way we can say this is less than some power series whose radius of convergence is infinite.
If that won't work, is there any way to use the M-Test? The only problem with the M-Test is that $x^2$ varies greatly, which would make choosing a sequence of constants $M_k$ difficult.
Aside from that, the only other thing I could imagine is showing that the sum of the terms (functions) is uniformly convergent (to $f$) and that each term of the series is continuous which would imply that the sum function $f$ is continuous.
Would any of these strategies be useful in this situation? Would one be more efficient than another?
I thank Sangchul Lee for the initial hints in the comments.
The point is that continuity is a local property. The advantage of locality is that one doesn't need to worry about universality of bounds , because confining your input to a certain interval is far more convenient to push through. Let $f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{x^2}{x^3+n^3}$. Note that $f$ exists as a function, because $$ \frac{x^2}{x^3+n^3} \leq x^2\frac{1}{n^3} \implies f(x)\ \leq x^2\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^3} \leq Cx^2 $$ for $C = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^3} <\infty$.
Approach 1
Approach 2
I think I should add some comments around the approaches listed : the point is that the Weierstrass M-test doesn't apply to $f$ if the domain is $[0,\infty)$.
Basically, if you see the second approach, the $M_n$ used there would be infinite if I slid $x$ to infinity. The first approach realizes that one must "remove" the reason (which is $x^2$) why the Weierstrass test fails which is the infinite behaviour, see that the M-test works now, and then put back the reason $x^2$ without compromising on continuity.
The second one is based upon the fact that we can compromise on uniformity by going "local" : the trouble for the M-test is at infinity, but going local means that we avoid infinity, and are therefore able to assert continuity on bounded intervals, which we paste together (and don't need to worry about the $\delta$ being the same $x$ in different patches for a given $\epsilon$ because we aren't looking for uniform continuity!) to get our result.