I'm new to field extensions and I can neither see why or how to prove this statement.
If I'm not mistaken, to construct a splitting field, you construct rupture fields one after the other, using that the $8$ element field is the splitting field of $X^8-X$ over $\mathbb F_2$, since $2$ is the only prime divisor of 8.
Over $\mathbb F_2$ $X^8-X$ has two roots : $0$ and $1$. Therefore $X^8-X=X(X-1)(1+X+...+X^6)$. The last factor, call it $P$, has no roots. So let $\alpha$ be a root in some extension $\mathbb F_2(\alpha)$ of $\mathbb F_2$.
We now have $P=(X-\alpha)(X^5+\alpha X^4+...+\alpha^4X+\alpha^5)$.
I suspect $\alpha$ might not be the way to go and if so, my second plan would be to reduce $P$. I don't know how to do this but assuming it to be done, hence having $P=P_1...P_n$, I could start using $P_1$'s rupture field, and then my best guess is that if $\mathbb F_2[X]/(P_1)$ is not sufficient, I re-reduce $P$ over this new field and consider the rupture field of one of the factors, and so on.
Now assuming I wasn't given the statement itself, is it elementary to construct the $8$ element field using $\mathbb F_2$ ?
In characteristic $2$ $$X^8-X=X(X-1)(X^3+X+1)(X^3+X^2+1).$$ If $\alpha$ is a zero of $X^3+X+1$ then $$X^3+X+1=(X-\alpha)(X-\alpha^2)(X-\alpha^4)$$ and $$X^3+X^2+1=(X-\alpha^3)(X-\alpha^5)(X-\alpha^6).$$ This implies that $$\Bbb F_8=\Bbb F_2(\alpha)\cong\frac{\Bbb F_2[X]}{\left<X^3+X+1\right>}.$$