My question is not really about proving this fact. Instead, it is about the sense of the sentence. What does "the topology induced by the usual distance" mean? I never understood it clearly.
To prove the proposition, I thought of the Cauchy sequence defined by $a_n=\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{n}$, which converges to $e$ and does not belong to $\mathbb{Q}$.
Thanks!
So first let us start by defining the usual distance on the real numbers.
That same metric can be considered over $\mathbb{Q}$.
Now that we have a metric on $\mathbb{Q}$ we can create a topology by defining a basis. We start by taking for any point $a\in \mathbb{Q}$ the open interval centered around $a$ to be topologically open i.e. for any positive real number $\epsilon$ $$(a-\epsilon,a+\epsilon)$$
Now we define open sets. We say that a set $A$ is open iff it can be created by taking the union of collection of open intervals. This may be a collection of finite open sets or infinitely many open intervals.
Now for completeness
Now to prove that $(\mathbb{Q},d)$ is not complete.
Consider the sequence $S=\{3, 3.1, 3.14, 3.141, 3.1415, \dots\}$ basically the sequence where $x_n$ has the first $n$ decimal places of $\pi$. Clearly $$\lim_{i\to +\infty} x_i=\pi$$ but $\pi\notin \mathbb{Q}$ which means that technically, $S$ has not limit in $\mathbb{Q}$.
Since we found a sequence in $(\mathbb{Q},d)$ that has no limit in $(\mathbb{Q},d)$, we deduce that $(\mathbb{Q},d)$ is not complete.
Hope this helped.