Let $M$ be a compact subset of $\mathbb{R}^3 $ with the standard orientation $\mu =[e_1,e_2,e_3] $ and let $S = \partial{M}$ is its smooth boundary with the induced orientation from $M$. Prove there exists a smooth normal unit field $\textbf{n}(x) = (n_1(x),n_2(x),n_3(x))$ for $x \in S$ such that if {$v_1,v_2$} is a basis for $T_xS$ with [$v_1,v_2$] = $\partial{\mu}$ then [$v_1,v_2,\textbf{n}(x)$] = $\mu$. I know that given $v_1$ and $v_2$, I can construct a unit vector $v_3$ orthogonal to $v_1$ and $v_2$ using the cross product. I think this would imply that $n_1 = v_1$, $n_2 = v_2$ and $n_3 = v_3$ but how does this imply exactly that [$v_1,v_2,\textbf{n}(x)$] = [$v_1,v_2,v_3$] = $\mu$?
2026-03-25 16:01:58.1774454518
Prove there exists a outward unit normal field on the boundary this manifold
365 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in ORIENTATION
- Are closed (topological) submanifold in $\mathbb R^n$ of codimension 1 orientable?
- Orientation and Coloring
- extended kalman filter equation for orientation quaternion
- Sphere eversion in $\mathbb R^4$
- Regarding Surgery and Orientation
- Showing that 2 pairs of vectors span the same subspace and that their frames belong to opposite orientations of that subspace
- First obstacle to triviality is orientability
- Is orientability needed to define volumes on riemannian manifolds?
- How do I determine whether the orientation of a basis is positive or negative using the cross product
- Orientations of pixels of image
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS-WITH-BOUNDARY
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- Integration of one-form
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
- Giving a counterexample for the extension lemma of smooth functions
- A question about the proof of Extension Lemma for Smooth functions
- Manifolds with boundary and foliations
- Pullbacks and differential forms, require deep explanation + algebra rules
- Possible to describe random 3D surfaces (geograhical height over limited area) by formula?
- Can you hear the pins fall from bowling game scores?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
By your description, I assume your $M$ is a smooth orientable $3$-manifold. Then I think you can drop the compactness hypothesis. Indeed, since your $M$ is a manifold with boundary $\partial M=S$, then $S$ is a $2$-manifold without boundary in $\mathbb{R}^3$, or a usual surface. As you pointed out, it is orientable as it can be put on the boundary orientation inherited from $M$. But you don't have to specify orientation, just now translate your orientability to charts. One well-known definition of orientation on a manifold is that you have an oriented atlas, i.e a compatible atlas $\{(\phi,U)\}$ such that whenever $U\cap V\neq\emptyset$ for a pair of carts $(\phi,U)$, $(\psi,V)$ in the atlas, $\det(\psi\circ \phi^{-1})|_{\phi(U\cap V)}>0$. Use this definition for your surface $S$. You can use parametrizations (inverses of charts) in this case, as they may be more useful as maps from open subsets of $\mathbb{R}^2$ into $S\cap \mathbb{R}^3$.
Whenever $(x,A)$ is parametrization of $U=x(A)\subset S$ and $p\in U$, define $\eta(p)=\frac{x_u\times x_v}{|x_u\times x_v|}(x(p))$, where $u,v$ are the coordinates in $A\subset \mathbb{R}^2$. This is well defined at $p$ because since $x$ is a parametrization, its differential is one-one and hence $x_u\times x_v\neq 0$. Clearly it is unit and normal to $T_pS=span\{x_u, x_v\}$. It's also smooth on $U$ by definition. So, you are only left with proving that it doesn't depend on the parametrization used around $p$.
For this, observe that if $(y,B)$ is any other parametrizations of $S$ with $p\in x(A)\cap y(B)$ and $\eta^{'}(p)=\frac{y_u\times y_v}{|y_u\times y_v|}(y(p))$, since $\eta(p), \eta^{'}(p)$ are both orthogonal to $T_pS$ and unit, it can only happen $\eta(p)=\pm \eta^{'}(p)$. The plus sign is going to happen precisely because $(y_u\times y_v)(y(p))=x_u\times x_v (x(p))\cdot \det(y^{-1}\circ x)|_{x^{-1}(p)}$, and this $\det$ is positive by the choice of your parametrizations, or charts.
$\textbf{Added}$: this last step you can prove it by observing that the $dx_{x^{-1}(p)}, dy_{y^{-1}(p)}: \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow T_pS\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ are isomorphisms, the cross product in $\mathbb{R}^3$ is bilinear and antisymmetric, and that the only (up to scalars) bilinear and antisymmetric map in $\mathbb{R}^2$ is $\det$. It takes some details, but that's an idea to prove it. Another is just brute force calculation.