Proving H is NOT a subgroup of G given G is NOT abelian

1.6k Views Asked by At

Proving the following sets are subgroups of an abelian group, G, is simple enough using the subgroup test, but I'm struggling to find counterexamples that show if G is NOT abelian, H is not necessarily a subgroup using the fact that G is not abelian.

$H_1=\{g \in G\ |\ g = g^{-1}\}$

$H_2=\{g \in G\ |\ g^n = e\}$ where n is a fixed integer.

The best I've come up with as a counterexample for $H_1$ is $G=D_3$ and $H_1=\{\text{the identity and the set of flips}\}$, but it's not a subgroup because its not closed, not because G is not abelian... or is it? I have nothing for $H_2$.

4

There are 4 best solutions below

0
On

Take the free product of two cyclic groups, $G=C_n\ast C_m$, with $C_n=\langle a \mid a^n=e\rangle$ and $C_m=\langle b \mid b^m =e\rangle$. Then the product $ab$ has infinite order. So neither $H_1$ nor $H_2$ for any $n\in \mathbb{N}$ is a subgroup. We have used the fact, that the free product here is not abelian. More counterexamples are given in this question.

1
On

Actually your choice of $D_3$ is correct for $H_1$. Recall that a subgroup of a group is a subset of the group's elements which satisfies three conditions: (1) it is closed under the group operation; (2) it contains the identity element; (3) it contains the inverse of each of its elements. Then a subset can fail to be a subgroup by failing to satisfy any of these conditions, so not being closed is enough.

And in this case, not being closed itself follows from being non-Abelian, which we can show by showing the contrapositive: If $H_1$ were closed, then $H_1$ would be Abelian. To see that: Let $a$, $b$ be in $H_1$. By closure, $ab$ is in $H_1$. By definition of $H_1$, $ab$ = $(ab)^{-1}$, or multiplying both sides by $ab$, $abab$=$e$. Multiply by $a$ on left, $b$ on right: $(aa)ba(bb)$=$a(e)b$, or by definition of $H_1$, $ba$=$ab$. SUMMARY: If $H_1$ is closed, any two elements commute --> Abelian.

0
On

Consider the elements $a=(1,2,3,\ldots,n)$ and $b=(n,n+1,2n-1)$ of $S_{2n-1}$.

Then $a$ and $b$ are $n$-cycles and have order $n$, but $ab = (1,2,3,\ldots,2n-1)$ is a $(2n-1)$-cycle, so we have $a^n=b^n=1$ but $(ab)^n \ne 1$.

(By $ab$ I mean $b$ followed by $a$ - of course $ba$ is also a $(2n-1)$-cycle.)

0
On

The example with $D_3$ for $H_1$ is good. For $H_2$ take $$ H_2=\{\sigma\in S_3:\sigma^2=\mathit{id}\} $$ where $S_3$ is the symmetric group on three objects and $\mathit{id}$ is the identity. Then $H_2$ has four elements: $$ H_2=\{\mathit{id},(12),(13),(23)\} $$ so it cannot be a subgroup; actually, it is the same as your $H_1$.

On the other hand $$ H_2'=\{\sigma\in S_3:\sigma^3=\mathit{id}\} $$ is a subgroup of $S_3$: $H_2'=\{\mathit{id},(123),(132)\}=\langle(123)\rangle$.