Let $A$ and $B$ be propositional formulas.
In order to prove that $A \equiv B$ (i.e. $A$ is logically equivalent to $B$) using natural deduction, would you need to prove that $A \vdash B$ and $B \vdash A$? Or can one derivation be sufficient?
Let $A$ and $B$ be propositional formulas.
In order to prove that $A \equiv B$ (i.e. $A$ is logically equivalent to $B$) using natural deduction, would you need to prove that $A \vdash B$ and $B \vdash A$? Or can one derivation be sufficient?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Yes, proving that $A$ is logically equivalent to $B$ amounts to prove that $A \vdash B$ (i.e. $B$ is derivable from the hypothesis $A$) and $B \vdash A$ (i.e. $A$ is derivable from the hypothesis $B$).
This is not by chance! Indeed, $A \equiv B$ means that $(A \to B) \land (B \to A)$, and proving $(A \to B) \land (B \to A)$ amounts to prove two things: