I’m trying to understand a proof that appeared in a paper that I’m reading. The proof is about an inequality regarding the Wasserstein metric. My question is only related to showing that a particular integral is larger than the Wasserstein metric of two probability measures.
First, the p-th Wasserstein metric is given by: $$ W_p(\nu,\mu):=\inf \left \{ \left(\int_{X^2}\mid x-y\mid^pd\pi(x,y)\right)^{\frac{1}{p}}; \pi\in P(X^2);\pi_o = \nu; \pi_1=\mu \right \} $$
Where $\nu,\mu$ are probability measures and $\pi$ is a coupling of $\nu$ and $\mu$.
Now, let $T:X \rightarrow X$, and assume that $$ \nu((-\infty,T(x)]) = \mu((-\infty,x]), \ \forall x \in \mathbb R $$
Also, assume that $\mu$ is the standard Gaussian measure on $\mathbb R$. How does one then shows that:
$$ \int_\mathbb R \frac{(T(x) - x)^2}{2} d\mu(x)\geq \frac{W_2^2(\nu,\mu)}{2} $$
I believe that is not necessary for $\mu$ to be a Gaussian, because this was used in the a different part of the proof. But I included this information, since this is how it was presented.
Although I think the answer by @dirich1337 is correct, there might be a simpler answer without using the Monge-Kantorovich equivalence.
What I came up with is the following. Let $\pi$ be the product measure, hence $\pi = \mu \times \nu$. This is indeed a coupling, so we immediately have $$ \int_{X^2} (x-y)^2d\pi\geq W_2^2(\mu,\nu) $$
The only thing left to show would be that using such coupling, we end up with the desired integral. Which is true, as shown below: $$ \int y d\nu(y) = \int T(x) d\mu(x) $$ $$ \int_{\mathbb R^2}(x-y)^2d(\mu\times\nu)= \int_{\mathbb R}\int_{\mathbb R} (x-y)^2d\nu d\mu= \\ = \int_{\mathbb R}\int_{\mathbb R} x^2d\nu d\mu - 2\int_{\mathbb R}x d\mu \int_{\mathbb R} y d\nu+ \int_{\mathbb R}\int_{\mathbb R} y^2d\nu d\mu = \\ = \int_{\mathbb R} x^2d\mu - 2\int_{\mathbb R}x d\mu \int_{\mathbb R} T(x) d\mu+ \int_{\mathbb R} T(x)^2d\mu = \int_{\mathbb R}(x-T(x))^2d\mu $$