So I'm asked to prove that $\mathbb{F}_9$, defined as $\{ a+bi$ | $a,b \in \mathbb{Z}_3,$ $i^2 = 2 \}$, is isomorphic to the field $F_1$, defined as $\mathbb{Z}_3[x]/ \langle x^2+2x+2 \rangle$, where $x^2 = x+1$. I know I need to define a function between the two in order to prove this (we have yet to be taught that since they both have 9 elements, they are isomorphic). I tried to define the function as $\phi(a+bi)=a+bx$, but then it isn't even homomorphic, because $\phi((a+bi)(c+di)) \neq \phi (a+bi)\phi(c+di)$. I am getting
$\phi((a+bi)(c+di)) = \phi (ac+adi+bci+bdi^2)$
$= \phi (ac+2bd+(ad+bc)i)$
$=ac+2bd+(ad+bc)x$
This is where I get stuck, because I know this should equal $ac+adx+bcx+bdx^2=ac+adx+bcx+bdx+bd$. Am I just completely wrong?
First in $\mathbb Z_3$, I prefer think at $-1$ instead of $2$ (since $(-1)^2 = 1$ is more natural that $2^2=1$)
If you're searching an explicit isomorphism, you don't want $\phi(a+bi)= a+bx$, but $\phi(a+bi) = \alpha + \beta x$ where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are unknown.
Since you want $\phi$ to be a homomorphism, $\phi(a+bi) = a\phi(1) + b\phi(i)$. Thus $\phi$ depends uniquely of $\phi(1)$ and $\phi(i)$.
Now:
show that $\phi(1)$ is either 1 or -1(hint: look at $\phi(3)$)(hint: look at $\phi(1)^3$ and remember about the properties of roots of a polynomial defined over a field). For simplicity, let's choose $\phi(1)=1$ (try also with $\phi(1)=-1$, it doesn't change a lot the following)You now have a candidate, you only have to show that this function actually is an isomorphism.