I suspect that the pushout in the category of Stone spaces and continuous maps exists and is the same as in the category of all topological spaces, but I have not found it in literature yet. I am looking for a reference.
2026-03-25 00:01:12.1774396872
Pushout in category of Stone spaces
267 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in REFERENCE-REQUEST
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Abstract Algebra Preparation
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- CLT for Martingales
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Identify sequences from OEIS or the literature, or find examples of odd integers $n\geq 1$ satisfying these equations related to odd perfect numbers
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in LIMITS-COLIMITS
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
- Prove that a "tensor product" principal $G$-bundle coincides with a "pullback" via topos morphism
- What prevents me from starting the cone in the objects mapped by the diagram
- Two morphisms $f, g : M \to L$ are equal as long as they are equal under the limit $L$.
- Separating coproducts by its index set
- Preservation of coproducts by coproducts
- Categorification of commutative sum
- Colimit of a directed system of modules
- Pullback square with two identical sides
- Subring of an inverse limit is the entire thing if maps to pieces are surjective
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As mentioned in the comments, existence is immediate by Stone duality: pushouts of Stone spaces are just dual to pullbacks of Boolean algebras. Alternatively, Stone spaces have all colimits because they are a reflective subcategory of topological spaces, so you can compute a colimit of a diagram of Stone spaces by first taking its colimit as topological spaces and then applying the reflector to Stone spaces. Explicitly, the reflector sends a space $X$ to the closure of the image of the evaluation map $X\to \{0,1\}^I$ where $I$ is the set of all continuous maps $X\to\{0,1\}$. (This is closely analogous to the construction of the Stone-Cech compactification, i.e. the reflector to compact Hausdorff spaces, which uses $[0,1]$ instead of $\{0,1\}$.)
Pushouts of Stone spaces do not coincide with pushouts of topological spaces in general. For instance, in this answer to a closely related question, I gave an example of a pair of maps $$f,g:\beta\mathbb{N}\to K$$ (here $K$ is the Cantor set) whose coequalizer in the category of topological spaces is $[0,1]$. Since $[0,1]$ is not a Stone space, the coequalizer in Stone spaces must obviously be different, and in fact is just a point (the reflection of $[0,1]$ in Stone spaces). You can turn this into an example with pushouts instead of coequalizers by just taking the diagram $$K\stackrel{(f,1)}\leftarrow \beta\mathbb{N}\coprod K\stackrel{(g,1)}\to K$$ where $(f,1)$ is the map that is $f$ on $\beta\mathbb{N}$ and the identity on $K$, and similarly for $(g,1)$. A pushout of this diagram is the same thing as a coequalizer of $f$ and $g$, so the pushout in topological spaces is $[0,1]$ while the pushout in Stone spaces is a point.