Simply put, if you look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor#Significance it says you can go from the traditional four "vector calculus" maxwell equations to two tensor Maxwell equations. Now I was able to convert the first two into the equation $\partial_{\alpha} F^{\alpha\beta} = \mu_0 J^{\beta}$. However, I am struggling to get $\partial_\gamma F_{ \alpha \beta } + \partial_\alpha F_{ \beta \gamma } + \partial_\beta F_{ \gamma \alpha } = 0$ from the last two equations. I am wondering if it easier to work from the more terse antisymmetrization form or if there is some other trick. I guess I'm just concerned that I don't know how to relate the idea of antisymmetrization to the levi-civita tensor which you need to somehow get out of this because in the last two equations you have the curl of $E$ rather than of $B$ which makes getting $F$ out much more difficult because $B$ in terms of $F$ involves the levi-civita symbol and $E$ does not.
2026-04-09 16:57:14.1775753834
Putting Maxwell's Equations in Tensor Form. (Carroll Chapter 1 Question 11)
966 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PHYSICS
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- What is meant by input and output bases?
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- Computing relative error with ideal gas law.
- Planetary orbits in a $4$-dimensional universe
- Applied Maths: Equations of Motion
- Return probability random walk
- What will be the velocity of a photon ejected from the surface of cesium by a photon with a frequency of 6.12E14 s^-1?
- What mathematical principal allows this rearrangement during simplifying
- Time when velocity of object is zero and position at that point in time
Related Questions in MATHEMATICAL-PHYSICS
- Why boundary conditions in Sturm-Liouville problem are homogeneous?
- What is the value of alternating series which I mention below
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Intuition behind quaternion multiplication with zero scalar
- Return probability random walk
- "Good" Linear Combinations of a Perturbed Wave Function
- Yang–Mills theory and mass gap
- Self adjoint operators on incomplete spaces
- Algebraic geometry and algebraic topology used in string theory
- Compute time required to travel given distance with constant acceleration and known initial speed
Related Questions in TENSORS
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- tensor differential equation
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- What is this notation?
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Generalization of chain rule to tensors
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- $n$-dimensional quadratic equation $(Ax)x + Bx + c = 0$
- What's the best syntax for defining a matrix/tensor via its indices?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
[To fix notation: I'll use Greek spacetime indices $\alpha,\beta,\ldots$ running over $0,1,2,3$, and Latin spatial indices $i,j,k$ running over $1,2,3$.]
There are four equations in $\partial_\gamma F_{ \alpha \beta } + \partial_\alpha F_{ \beta \gamma } + \partial_\beta F_{ \gamma \alpha } = 0$, depending on which index is missing. A nice way to rewrite it would be $$ \epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}\partial_\beta F_{\gamma\delta}=0$$ which makes the four equations very clear, depending on how you choose $\alpha$. Here $\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}$ is the completely antisymmetric tensor, with $\epsilon^{0123}=1$. This is helpful, because once you know where the 0 index is (there must be exactly one to make it nonzero), the rest can be written in terms of the three-dimensional antisymmetric symbol (careful with signs!). For example, $\epsilon^{ij0k}=+\epsilon_{ijk}$. Pick whether $\alpha$ is 0 or spatial, and then, if you need to, split the sums over spacetime indices into (term with 0) + (spatial terms).