I am looking for the following tensor field $T^i_j$ on closed riemann manifold $M$ which is dependent only from metric tensor $g_{ij}$ and its Riemann cirvature tensor $R^i_{jkl}$ and moreover quadratic by $R^i_{jkl}$ which have zero divergence: $$ \nabla_i T^i_j = 0, $$ For example, the Einstein tensor have zero divergence but it is linear by Ricci tensor and hence linear by Riemann curvature tensor. On the other hand the following tensor: $$ T^i_j = R_j^i R, $$ is quadratic by $R^i_{jkl}$ but in general have non zero divergence in the sense given above.
2026-03-25 10:58:46.1774436326
Quadratic from Riemann tensor with zero divergence
550 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in TENSORS
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- tensor differential equation
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- What is this notation?
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Generalization of chain rule to tensors
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- $n$-dimensional quadratic equation $(Ax)x + Bx + c = 0$
- What's the best syntax for defining a matrix/tensor via its indices?
Related Questions in CURVATURE
- Sign of a curve
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
- CAT(0) references request
- Why is $\kappa$ for a vertical line in 2-space not undefined?
- Discrete points curvature analysis
- Local computation of the curvature form of a line bundle
- Closed surface embedded in $\mathbb R^3$ with nonnegative Gaussian curvature at countable number of points
- What properties of a curve fail to hold when it is not regular?
Related Questions in GENERAL-RELATIVITY
- How do I use Maple to calculate the Christoffel Symbols of a Metric?
- Do pp-wave spacetimes have a well-defined signature/index?
- Understanding the tensor notation in special/general theory of relativity
- Difference between $T^{i}_{\;\;j}$ and $T_i^{\;\;j}$?
- How can one write a line element for non-integer dimensions?
- Complex coordinates in curved space
- Riemannian Geometry, GR, importance summary?
- Demonstration of relation between geodesics and FLRW metric
- Product between two timelike vectors in any given metric
- Curvature tensor in terms of the metric tensor
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There might be two ways to construct the expected tensor.
First, perhaps you may want to have a look at $f(S)$ gravity, where $S$ means the scalar curvature. This method considers the following functional of the metric $g$ $$ I[g]=\int_{M}f(S)\,{\rm d}V, $$ where $M$ stands for the closed Riemannian manifold, ${\rm d}V$ is its invariant volume form, and $f$ denotes some smooth function. In the special case $f(S)=S$, this functional reduces to the Einstein-Hilbert action. Now, apply calculus of variation to $I[g]$ with respect to $g$, and Noether's theorem guarantees its functional derivative $$ \frac{\delta I[g]}{\delta g^{\mu\nu}}=f'(S)\,{\rm Ric}_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}\,g_{\mu\nu}\,f(S)+\left(g_{\mu\nu}\,g^{\sigma\tau}\nabla_{\sigma}\nabla_{\tau}-\nabla_{\mu}\nabla_{\nu}\right)f'(S) $$ to be divergence free, where ${\rm Ric}$ is the Ricci tensor, and $\nabla$ means the Levi-Civita connection. Finally, by choosing, e.g., $f(S)=S^2$, you may obtain a divergence-free tensor with its main part (first two terms in the last formulation) quadratic in the Riemann curvature tensor. Unfortunately, as you will see, this result includes additional derivative terms, hence is not a fully quadratic expression.
Second, perhaps you may want to explore a most general form of the expected quadratic tensor $$ T=\left<C,R\otimes R\right>, $$ where $C$ is a $g$-isotropic tensor, $R$ means the Riemann curvature tensor, and $\left<\cdot,\cdot\right>$ denotes the tensor contraction operator. Its entrywise form reads $$ T_{\xi\eta}=C_{\tau\rho\xi\eta}^{\mu\nu\sigma\alpha\beta\gamma}\,R_{\mu\nu\sigma}^{\tau}\,R_{\alpha\beta\gamma}^{\rho}. $$ Here $g$-isotropic means that $C$ remains identical under all isometries that preserves $g$. Therefore, if $C$ is rank-two, it must be $$ C_{\mu\nu}=K\,g_{\mu\nu} $$ with $K$ being a constant; if $C$ is rank-four, it must be $$ C_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}=K_1\,g_{\mu\nu}\,g_{\alpha\beta}+K_2\,g_{\mu\alpha}\,g_{\nu\beta}+K_3\,g_{\mu\beta}\,g_{\nu\alpha} $$ with $K_1$, $K_2$, $K_3$ being constants. Now that $C$ is rank-ten from above, and you will have 945 $K_j$'s (of course, provided that $R$ is partly anti-symmetric, many of these constants vanish). Nevertheless, since $C$ is made up of $g$, it appears to be a "constant" tensor as you apply $\nabla$ to it, i.e., $\nabla_{\mu}C_{\cdots}=0$. Hence your goal reduces to explore the symmetric property of this rank-ten $C$ upon the requirement $$ \nabla^{\xi}T_{\xi\eta}=0. $$ Unfortunately, I am afraid this is so huge a task that even a special trial takes much more than expected.