When reading the following problem, do you assume that each premise is true? So since number 2 states ¬ B am I to assume that ¬ B is true? Which would mean B is false?
- A ∨ C → D Premise
- ¬ B Premise
- A ∨ B Premise
- A 2, 3, Disjunctive Syllogism
- A ∨ C 4, Addition
- D 1, 5, Modus Ponens QED.
Thanks for the help.
Yes, you can take premises as taken to be "true" (assumptions taken as given) from which you are to derive the conclusion. So given the premise $\lnot B,$ any assertion $B$ would lead to a contradiction.
So in your example, given $A\lor B$, and given $\lnot B$, we appeal to the rule of inference called disjunctive syllogism to warrant (justify) the deduction$A$.
From the deduced $A$, we use addition to "add" $A \lor C$ (since if A is logically deduced from accepted premises, and thus taken as true, so must $A\lor C$ be inferred.
Then, by modus ponens with the first premise and the inferred $A\lor C$, we conclude $\therefore D$.