Question on adjoint functors

416 Views Asked by At

Can someone provide me an enlightenment on the following three statements? (I stumbled on them at the part dealing injective modules in a text of homological algebra.)

1) Let $F \dashv G \colon \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}$ is a pair of adjoint functors and $F$ preserves monomorphisms. Then $G$ preserves injectives.

2) A left adjoint preserves epimorphisms.

3) A right adjoint preserves monomorphisms.

Seeing that the text gives no clues for the proofs, they must make an easy exercise. But I cannot make out how to show them.

3

There are 3 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

General advice when dealing with this sort of exercise: Definitions, definitions, definitions. Always go back to the definitions. Write down explicitly what you want to prove, and in 95% of cases the proof will almost write itself down for you.


For example for question #1: I will write down everything very formally. In a normal proof everything would be condensed in a few lines (cf. Hanno's answer), but hopefully this will help you in finding how to reason.

What is an injective? It's an object $I$ such that if for every morphism $f : A \to I$ and every monomorphism (notice how $F$ conveniently preserves monomorphisms?) $g : A \to B$, there exists a morphism $h : B \to I$ such that $h \circ g = f$ (write down the commutative diagram).

Now you want to show that if

  • Data 1: $I \in \mathcal{D}$ is injective,

then $G(I) \in \mathcal{C}$ is injective. So by definition you take

  • Data 2: any morphism $f : A \to G(I)$, and
  • Data 3: any monomorphism $g : A \to B$,

and you look for some $h : B \to G(I)$ that makes the diagram commute.

Now you only have two hypotheses:

  • Hyp 4: $F \dashv G$,
  • Hyp 5: $F$ preserves monomorphisms.

There's only one monomorphism in this story, so apply your Hyp 5 to it:

  • Fact 6: $F(g) : F(A) \to F(B)$ is a monomorphism.

You know that $I$ is injective. By Hyp 4, you've got a morphism $\tilde{f} : F(A) \to I$ naturally associated to $f$. By taking Fact 6 into account, and the Data 1 that $I$ is injective, you find that

  • Fact 7: there exists a morphism $\phi : F(B) \to I$ such that $\phi \circ F(g) = \tilde{f}$.

Now you apply Hyp 4 again and you find a morphism $h = \bar\phi : B \to G(I)$. Since the adjunction $F \dashv G$ is natural, you finally find that $h \circ g = f$. Qed.


Now if you follow the same pattern of reasoning you should find the answers to question 2 and 3.

1
On

Hint for (1): Note that an object $I\in{\mathscr D}$ is injective if and only if ${\mathscr D}(-,I): {\mathscr D}^{\text{op}}\to\textsf{Set}$ preserves epimorphisms (i.e., turns monomorphisms in ${\mathscr D}$ into surjective maps of sets) - and analogously for objects of ${\mathscr C}$. Now suppose $X\in{\mathscr D}$ is injective & that ${\mathscr F}$ preserves monomorphisms and check that by adjointness of ${\mathscr F}$ and ${\mathscr G}$ the functor ${\mathscr C}(-,{\mathscr G}X)$ also maps monomorphisms in ${\mathscr C}$ to epimorphisms.

Parts (2) and (3) are similar, noting that a morphism $f: X\to Y$ in ${\mathscr C}$ is, say, an epimorphism if and only if for all $Z\in{\mathscr C}$ the induced map of sets ${\mathscr C}(f,Z): {\mathscr C}(Y,Z)\to{\mathscr C}(X,Z)$ is injective, i.e. a monomorphism in $\textsf{Set}$. Similar for monomorphisms.

1
On

Although the previous answers contain hints how to prove 2) and 3), it seems desirable to give a complete proof.

We only prove 2), the proof of 3) is dual.

Let $F : \mathcal C \to \mathcal D$ be a left adjoint to some functor $G : \mathcal D \to \mathcal C$. This means that there is a natural bijection $$\tau_{X,Y} : \mathcal D(F(X),Y) \to \mathcal C(X,G(Y)), X \in ob(\mathcal C), Y \in ob(\mathcal D) . $$

Let $e : Z \to X$ be an epimorphism in $\mathcal C$. We have to show that $F(e) : F(Z) \to F(X)$ is an epimorphism in $\mathcal D$ which means that if $f_0, f_1 : F(X) \to Y$ are two morphisms in $\mathcal D$ such that $f_0 \circ F(e) = f_1 \circ F(e)$, then $f_0 = f_1$.

Consider the following commutative diagram:

$\require{AMScd}$ \begin{CD} \mathcal D(F(X),Y) @>{\tau_{X,Y}}>> \mathcal C(X,G(Y)) \\ @V{F(e)^*}VV @VV{e^*}V \\ \mathcal D(F(Z),Y) @>>{\tau_{Z,Y}}> \mathcal C(Z,G(Y)) \end{CD}

We are given $f_0, f_1 \in \mathcal D(F(X),Y)$ such that $F(e)^*(f_0) = f_0 \circ F(e) = f_1 \circ F(e) = F(e)^*(f_1)$. We conclude $$\tau_{X,Y}(f_0)\circ e = e^*(\tau_{Z,Y}(f_0)) = \tau_{Z,Y}(F(e)^*(f_0)) = \\ \tau_{Z,Y}(F(e)^*(f_1)) = e^*(\tau_{Z,Y}(f_1)) = \tau_{X,Y}(f_1)\circ e .$$ Thus $\tau_{X,Y}(f_0) = \tau_{X,Y}(f_1)$ because $e$ is an epimorphism. Hence $f_0 = f_1$ because $\tau_{X,Y}$ is a bijection.

A nice corollary is this:

A necessary condition for $F : \mathcal C \to \mathcal D$ having a right adjoint is that $F$ preserves epimorphisms.