Question on the differences in the definitions of what a tensor is

86 Views Asked by At

Below are the common definitions of tensor.

a. "a tensor is a quantity which transforms according to a definite law under the change of the coordinate system".

b. "a tensor is a multilinear function which takes vectors and duals and produces a scalar"

Questions:

  1. How are these two definitions related? That is, how can we start with one of definitions and arrive at the other?
  2. What is the significance of being "multilinear"? If we have a function of vectors & duals producing a scalar which is not multilinear, what breaks down?

The way I have so far understood a tensor is as follows. Multiple vectors might act on each point in space and produce a result. Tensor is a way of describing the whole phenomena. But again, I could not relate this to the definitions. Why "invariance under coordinate change" or "mulitlinearity" are required here?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

Let's start by making definition a detailed: under general coordinate transformations, a tensor satisfies$$T^{a_1\cdots a_p}_{\qquad b_1\cdots b_q}=\prod_{i=1}^p\frac{\partial x^{a_i}}{\partial y^{A_i}}\cdot\prod_{j=1}^q\frac{\partial y^{B_j}}{\partial x^{b_j}}\cdot T^{A_1\cdots A_p}_{\qquad B_1\cdots B_q}$$(all "products" herein are also contracted over). You can verify the contraction of two tensors is a tensor; you'll just need to use$$\frac{\partial x^a}{\partial y^A}\frac{\partial y^A}{\partial x^b}=\delta^a_b,\,\frac{\partial y^A}{\partial x^a}\frac{\partial x^a}{\partial y^B}=\delta^A_B.$$Therefore, tensors are closed under contracting away all the indices to make a scalar, viz.$$S:=T^{a_1\cdots a_p}_{\qquad b_1\cdots b_q}\prod_iD^{(i)}_{a_i}\prod_jV^{b_j}_{(j)}$$(our duals $D^{(i)}_{a_i}$ and vectors $V_{(j)}^{b_j}$ have bracketed labels that shouldn't be confused with their contractible indices). Then $S$ is invariant under GCTs, showing definition a implies definition b - including, in particular, the multilinearity in the $D$s & $V$s. We can prove the converse using scalars' invariance and the duals' and vectors' behaviour under GCTs,$$D_{a_i}^{(i)}=\frac{\partial y^{A_i}}{\partial x^{a_i}}D_{A_i}^{(i)},\,V^{b_j}_{(j)}=\frac{\partial x^{b_j}}{\partial y^{B_j}}V^{B_j}_{(j)}.$$