My question is regarding the condition $AB5$ for an abelian category $\mathcal{A}$ i.e. direct sums exists and filtered colimits are exact. Now taking colimit is right exact in an abelian category given the colimit exists. Say I'm given monomorphisms $\phi_{i}: M_{i} \rightarrow N_{i}$ indexed over filtered category $I$. The kernel is a finite limit. Now, I know filtered colimit commutes with finite limit when the target category is $Sets$. Then does it mean when the target category is an arbitrary abelian category, then filtered colimit need not commute with kernel? More generally, I would like to have some idea on what kind of target category does this commutativity hold?
2026-03-31 22:01:42.1774994502
Regarding condition $AB5$
359 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in HOMOLOGICAL-ALGEBRA
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- $A$ - dga over field, then $H^i(A) = 0, i > 1$ implies $HH_i(A) = 0, i < -1$
- Tensor product $M\otimes_B Hom_B(M,B)$ equals $End_B(M)$, $M$ finitely generated over $B$ and projective
- Group cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}(V)$
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- Existence of adjugant with making given natural transformation be the counit
- Noetherian property is redundant?
- What is the monomorphism that forms the homology group?
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Related Questions in ABELIAN-CATEGORIES
- What is the monomorphism that forms the homology group?
- Injective objects in a category
- Category of complexes
- Snake lemma and regular epi mono factorization
- A question to Weibel’s IHA lemma 2.6.14 Part 2
- Why do the finitely generated subsheaves of a sheaf form a directed system?
- Supremum of a family of subobjects in an abelian category
- Opposite effective classes in a Grothendieck group
- Question about $\mbox{Ext}$ groups in abelian categories
- How to show that $\mathsf{Ab}$(Category of Abelian Groups) is an abelian category?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I am not sure whether I understand your question, but for abelian categories, AB5 is equivalent to the fact that filtered colimits preserve finite limits.
First of all, a filtered colimit functor, or any colimit functor, on an abelian category is always right exact (since it is a left adjoint to the diagonal embedding/constant diagram functor). It follows that when a filtered colimit functor is not exact, i.e. AB5 fails, the failure of exactness is due to the failure of left exactness, i.e. failure to preserve kernels.
(In a sense, this occurs in nature quite often, i.e. take $\mathcal{A}=(\mathrm{Mod-}R)^{op}$. Then this is typically not an AB5-category since inverse limits are typically not exact in $\mathrm{Mod-}R$.)
On the other hand, in an AB5-abelian category, filtered colimit functors preserve all finite limits. The reason is that one can represent all limits as a composition of simpler ones. Typically, all limits are obtained just as equalizer of pair of morphisms between certain products (whose form depends only on the diagram shape), and in the case of finite limits in an Abelian category, any finite limit is obtained as a kernel of a map between some finite biproducts, i.e. coproducts. But again, filtered colimit functor always preserves coproducts (it is a left adjoint), so preserving finite limits again comes down to preserving kernels, which is guaranteed by exactness.