Let $(M_{1},g_{1})$ and $(M_{2},g_{2})$ be two Riemannian manifolds. Let $% R_{1}$ and $R_{2}$ be the (1,3)-type Riemannian curvature tensors of $M_{1}$ and $M_{2}$, respectively. Finally, let $R$ be the Riemannian curvature tensor of the product manifold $M=M_{1}\times M_{2}$. Can I write a relation between $R$, $R_{1}$ and $R_{2}$? I know that if we select $f=1$ in a warped product manifold, we have a product manifold. So my guess is: if $% X_{1},Y_{1}\in \Gamma (M_{1}),$ $X_{2},Y_{2}\in \Gamma (M_{2}),$ $% X=(X_{1},X_{2})\in \Gamma (M),$ $Y=(Y_{1},Y_{2})\in \Gamma (M)$; then $% R(X,Y)=R_{1}(X_{1},Y_{1})+R_{2}(X_{2},Y_{2})$. Is this correct? If yes, how can I prove it? If not, what is the relation?
2026-03-28 11:13:34.1774696414
Riemannian curvature tensor of product manifolds
2.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in TENSORS
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- tensor differential equation
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- What is this notation?
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Generalization of chain rule to tensors
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- $n$-dimensional quadratic equation $(Ax)x + Bx + c = 0$
- What's the best syntax for defining a matrix/tensor via its indices?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, it's correct, assuming to be precise that what you mean by $``R_1 + R_2"$ is $$ R(X,Y)Z = (R_1(X_1, Y_1) Z_1, R_2(X_2, Y_2)Z_2). $$
I imagine there's some elegant way to prove this, but it certainly works to just do a bunch of silly calculations; in particular, you can show that for product vector fields $(X_1, X_2)$ and $(Y_1, Y_2)$, the connection of $M$ is given by
$$ \nabla_{(X_1, X_2)} (Y_1, Y_2) = (\nabla^{M_1}_{X_1} Y_1, \nabla^{M_2}_{X_2} Y_2) $$
using, for instance, the Koszul formula (I think you can also just check directly that the right side satisfies the properties of a Levi-Civita connection on $M$); then you can just use the standard defining formula for $R$
$$ R(X,Y) = \nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y \nabla_X - \nabla_{[X,Y]} $$
and it seems to just pop out.