I am trying to understand a piece of this proof (of a version of Helly's theorem). I understood everything except the passage in which the author says that $F(x)$ is right continuous. How can I prove that? Is it so clear from the contruction he made? Also, is it true that $F$ is continuous on rationals? And why? Thank you.
2026-04-05 19:03:52.1775415832
Right continuity of infimum on rational numbers
434 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in CONTINUITY
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Define in which points function is continuous
- Continuity of composite functions.
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- Show that f(x) = 2a + 3b is continuous where a and b are constants
- continuous surjective function from $n$-sphere to unit interval
- Two Applications of Schwarz Inequality
- Show that $f$ with $f(\overline{x})=0$ is continuous for every $\overline{x}\in[0,1]$.
- Prove $f(x,y)$ is continuous or not continuous.
- proving continuity claims
Related Questions in SUPREMUM-AND-INFIMUM
- $\inf A = -\sup (-A)$
- Supremum of Sumset (Proof Writing)
- If $A\subseteq(0,+\infty)$ is nonempty and closed under addition then it is not bounded above.
- Distance between a point $x \in \mathbb R^2$ and $x_1^2+x_2^2 \le 4$
- Prove using the completeness axiom?
- comparing sup and inf of two sets
- Supremum of the operator norm of Jacobian matrix
- Show that Minkowski functional is a sublinear functional
- Trying to figure out $\mu(\liminf_{n\to \infty}A_n) \le \liminf_{n\to \infty}\mu(A_n)$
- Real numbers to real powers
Related Questions in WEAK-CONVERGENCE
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- Find a sequence converging in distribution but not weakly
- Does $X_n\xrightarrow[n\to+\infty]{law} 0$ imply$\mathbb{E}\left(\log |1-X_n| \right)\xrightarrow[n\to +\infty]{} 0$?
- If $X_n\rightarrow X$ in distribution, how to show that $\mathbb{P}(X_n=x)\rightarrow 0$ if $F$ is continuous at $x$?
- Equivalence of weak convergences
- Weak convergence under linear operators
- Convergence of Probability Measures and Respective Distribution Functions
- Convergence in distribution of uniform
- Convergence of Maximum of Cauchy Random Variables
- Weak Convergence Confusion
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

Since we know that $F$ is increasing, to prove that $F$ is right continuous, it is sufficient to show that for any $x \in \mathbb{R}$ and for any $\epsilon > 0$ there exists $ y > x $ such that $F(y) < F(x) + \epsilon$. So take $x\in \mathbb{R}$ and $\epsilon >0$. Then by definition we can find $y \in \mathbb{Q}$ for which $x < y$ and $F(y) < F(x) + \epsilon$. Therefore $F$ is right continuous. For the second question $F$ is not necesarrily continuous at rationals. For instance let $\mu$ be a Borel probability measure on $\mathbb{R}$ supported on $\{0\}$, and $\mu_n = \mu$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$. In this case $F = 0$ on $(-\infty, 0)$ and $F=1$ on $[0, \infty)$. Thus $F$ is not continuous at $0$.