I was rolling out a pie crust tonight. I would like to produce a perfect circle, but part way through the border of my crust was a rather different closed curve. I am aware of the Riemann mapping theorem which says I can map my existing crust to a circle with an angle preserving map, but that may stretch and shrink locally, which will make the crust an uneven thickness. I don't care about preserving angles. If we assume my crust is uniformly thick now, I want to map it to an equal area disk preserving local areas so the thickness stays uniform. Is there a theorem that says I can?
2026-03-28 00:26:23.1774657583
Rolling out pie dough
400 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in SYMPLECTIC-GEOMETRY
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- Proof that 1-Form on a Symplectic Manifold is Closed?
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Dimension of the Marsden-Weinstein reduction of a coadjoint orbit in the dual of the Lie algebra of the gauge group (Atiyah-Bott context)
- Symplectic form on the n-torus
- Computing the flow on the cotangent bundle
- Action-angle variables in non-compact level sets
- About the tangent space of a coadjoint orbit
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm going to assume your pizza has smooth boundary.
Let $(M_i, \omega_i)$ be compact oriented smooth manifolds, possibly with boundary, equipped with a volume form. Suppose $M_1$ is oriented diffeomorphic to $M_2$, and they have the same volume $\int_{M_i} \omega_i.$ Then there is a diffeomorphism $f: M_1 \to M_2$ with $f^*\omega_2 = \omega_1$.
We can prove this by a trick of Moser's. First, reduce to the case that $M_1 = M_2$. Then we want to show there's a self-diffeomorphism of $M$ such that $f^* \omega_1 = \omega_0$. Because the volume forms give the same orientation of $M$, they are (smoothly) homotopic as volume forms; indeed, as volume forms in the same cohomology class: there is a smooth path $\omega_t$ of volume forms connecting them, with $[\omega_0] = [\omega_t]$. What I would like is to find a flow $f_t$ of a time-varying vector field $X_t$ such that $f_t^* \omega_t = \omega_0$; taking derivatives, if this were true, $$0 = \frac{d}{dt} (f_t^*\omega_t) = f_t^* (\mathcal L_{X_t} \omega_t) + f_t^*\left(\frac{d}{dt}\omega_t\right) = f_t^* \left(d\iota_{X_t} \omega_t+ \frac{d}{dt} \omega_t\right).$$ (Note that for the flow to make sense on a manifold with boundary, $X_t$ should always be tangent to the boundary, on the boundary.) Going backwards, if we can find a vector field $X_t$ with $d\iota_{X_t} \omega_t = - \frac{d}{dt} \omega_t$, then $X_t$ generates the desired flow. Because $[\frac{d}{dt} \omega_t] = 0$, $\frac{d}{dt} \omega_t = d\alpha_t$, where we choose $\alpha_t$ to vary smoothly in $t$. The nondegeneracy of the volume form is precisely what allows me to solve $\iota_{X_t} \omega_t = -\alpha_t$ uniquely for all $t$.
There is only one problem in the case with boundary: forcing $X_t$ to be tangent to the boundary. If it solves the above equation, this is precisely the same as saying that $\alpha_t\big|_{\partial M} = 0$. We can choose $\alpha_t$ to satisfy $d\alpha_t = \frac{d}{dt}\omega_t$ and $\alpha_t\big|_{\partial M} = \eta_t$ for any choice of $\eta_t$ on the boundary with zero volume (this is essentially the statement that $\frac{d}{dt} \omega_t$ is zero in the relative cohomology group $H^n(M,\partial M)$ - true precisely because $\int \omega_t$ is constant), this proving that we can choose an appropriate $\alpha_t$, thus obtaining an appropriate $X_t$, thus proving the theorem.
This in hand, your desired theorem follows from Schoenflies' theorem that the closed region bounded by any smooth circle in the plane is diffeomorphic to a disc.