I have an n variable boolean DNF formula and an input set,z consisting of n-tuples. Each tuple consists of truth/false assignment to n variable.
the number of tuples in Z is not fixed, obviously <= 2^n.
Example:
Lets assume, i have 2input DNF formula F(a,b) = a'b+ab'. Z={11,00,01}. I want to determine if any of these 3 input in Z satisfies F(a,b).
Again size Z is not fixed and worst case is 2^n input combination.
I want to prove whether this problem is NPC or P.I tried with boolean formula satisfiability but Z content is not fixed. So, they are not exactly the same problem and I know general DNF formula satisfiability is in P. any suggestion, please.
2026-03-25 01:13:08.1774401188
satisfying boolean n variable DNF formula
204 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NP-COMPLETE
- Divide set into two subsets of equal sum and maximum this sum
- Linear Programming Primal-Dual tough question
- Bipartite Graph Partitioning (special case)
- Minimise the sum of pairwise distances between labelled points in a metric space subject to covering some set of labels
- How should a chain of proof be written?
- Show the NP completeness of Hamiltonian Path with the knowledge of an directed Euler graph
- Integer Programming (non $0-1$) Reduction to show $NP$ Completeness
- Categories with at most one arrow between any pair of objects. (appears in NPC)
- Find a generalized path cover of a square graph
- Generalize minimum path cover
Related Questions in SATISFIABILITY
- How to prove that 3-CNF is satisfiable using Hall's marriage theorem?
- validity reduction between FOL fragments
- Reduction 3SAT to Subset Sum
- Is $\forall_x\forall_y\forall_z\Big(P(x,x)\wedge(P(x,z)\implies\big(P(x,y)\vee P(y,z)\big)\Big)\implies\exists_x\forall_y P(x,y)$ tautology?
- How to I correctly specify the following set of sets of edges of a graph
- First Order Logic - unsatisfiable set of formulas
- First Order Logic - Logical Consequence and Paradox
- Divide and conquer SAT Solver
- Integer Programming (non $0-1$) Reduction to show $NP$ Completeness
- Induction on formulas for substitution
Related Questions in CONJUNCTIVE-NORMAL-FORM
- Is 3-CNF to 2-CNF generally possible (or in particular)?
- k-CNF formulae and formulae that are not equivalent to them
- Help converting ANF to XORNF if even possible.
- CNF with Nested Quantifiers
- How to convert to formula to disjunctive normal form (DNF)?
- How can I come from NOT x AND y OR NOT z to two formulas: NOT x OR NOT z and NOT y OR z
- Is this possible: ( neg X AND Y) OR neg Z <=> (neg X OR neg Z) AND (neg Y OR Z)
- Converting $\big( (A \lor B) \land ((B \leftrightarrow A) \to C) \big) \lor (C \to \neg A)$ to CNF.
- How to transform a knowledge base (CNF) from propositional logic in a set?
- Is this the disjunctive and conjunctive nromal form for my porpositional formula F?
Related Questions in DISJUNCTIVE-NORMAL-FORM
- k-CNF formulae and formulae that are not equivalent to them
- How to convert to formula to disjunctive normal form (DNF)?
- Disjunctive normal form process
- What is the rule to eliminate (Z AND NEG Z) in this formula?
- Simplifying a logical formula
- Is this the disjunctive and conjunctive nromal form for my porpositional formula F?
- Is it possible for the DNF and CNF to be the same
- How do I convert this propositional formula to DNF?
- Are my DNF and CNF for $A \land (A \lor C) \implies (C \lor B)$ correct?
- Find minimal DNF and CNF of a logical expression $(A \implies C) \wedge \neg (B \wedge C \wedge D).$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Your problem is in P. Using the naive algorithm of just trying each input against each disjunction in Z, the runtime grows linearly with the size of Z and linearly with the size of F. There's no exponential growth in runtime with the size of the problem, therefore the problem remains in P.