So I've been asked to show that there is a bijection between $\pi_0(X)$ and $[S^0,X]$ for a topological space X but the definition given in my notes is: $\pi_n(X) = [S^n,X]$, so I'm finding this a bit confusing. The question is part b of the below image:
2026-05-04 12:25:31.1777897531
Show that there is a bijection between $[S^0,X]$ and $\pi_0(X)$ for a topological space X
155 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in HOMOLOGICAL-ALGEBRA
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- $A$ - dga over field, then $H^i(A) = 0, i > 1$ implies $HH_i(A) = 0, i < -1$
- Tensor product $M\otimes_B Hom_B(M,B)$ equals $End_B(M)$, $M$ finitely generated over $B$ and projective
- Group cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}(V)$
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- Existence of adjugant with making given natural transformation be the counit
- Noetherian property is redundant?
- What is the monomorphism that forms the homology group?
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Related Questions in HOMOTOPY-THEORY
- how to prove this homotopic problem
- Are $[0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ homotopy equivalent?
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Can $X=SO(n)\setminus\{I_n\}$be homeomorphic to or homotopic equivalent to product of spheres?
- Why do $S^1 \wedge - $ and $Maps(S^1,-)$ form a Quillen adjunction?
- Is $S^{n-1}$ a deformation retract of $S^{n}$ \ {$k$ points}?
- Connection between Mayer-Vietoris and higher dimensional Seifert-Van Kampen Theorems
- Why is the number of exotic spheres equivalent to $S^7,S^{11},S^{15},S^{27}$ equal to perfect numbers?
- Are the maps homotopic?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

Let $S^0 = \{0, 1 \}$ and denote the basepoint of $X$ by $x_0$.
By definition, $[S^0, X]$ is the set of equivalence classes of maps from $S^0 $ to $X$ sending $0$ to the basepoint $x_0$ modulo homotopy.
So let's ask ourselves: how can we classify such maps up to homotopy?
First of all, since all of our maps send $0$ to $x_0$, our maps are uniquely specified by where they send the point $1$.
So suppose you have two maps $f_1, f_2: S^0 \to X$, defined by $$ f_1 : 0 \mapsto x_0, \ \ 1 \mapsto x_1,$$ $$ f_2 : 0 \mapsto x_0, \ \ 1 \mapsto x_2.$$
These maps are homotopic iff there exists a continuous function $F: S^0 \times I \to X$ such that $$ F(t , 0) = f_1(t), \ \ F(t , 1) = f_2(t),$$ for $t \in S^0$.
If such a continuous function $F$ exists, then $s \mapsto F(1, s)$ is a continuous path between $x_1$ and $x_2$, so $x_1$ and $x_2$ are in the same path component.
Conversely, if $x_1$ and $x_2$ are in the same path component, then there exists a continuous path $\gamma : I \to X$ with $\gamma(0) = x_1$ and $\gamma(1) = x_2$, so we can define such a function $F$ by $$ F(0,s) = x_0, \ \ F(1,s) = \gamma (s).$$
The conclusion is that $[S^0, X]$ can be identified with the set of path components of $X$, which is precisely $\pi_0(X)$, by definition.