Let $B=(B_t)_{t\geq0}$ be a three-dimensional Brownian motion starting from $x\in\mathbb{R}^3$. Show that, for all $r>0$ and all $x$, $$\mathbb{P}_x(|B_t+z|=r\text{ for some }t\geq0\text{ and some }z\in\mathbb{Z}^3)=1.$$ I really can't see how to get started with this - any advice would be greatly appreciated!
2026-04-14 23:56:56.1776211016
Showing that Brownian motion will hit sphere with an exact integer distance
77 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-PROCESSES
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
- Probability being in the same state
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Why does there exists a random variable $x^n(t,\omega')$ such that $x_{k_r}^n$ converges to it
- Compute the covariance of $W_t$ and $B_t=\int_0^t\mathrm{sgn}(W)dW$, for a Brownian motion $W$
- Why has $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s$ the same distribution as $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s-B_t$ for a Brownian motion $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$?
- What is the name of the operation where a sequence of RV's form the parameters for the subsequent one?
- Markov property vs. transition function
- Variance of the integral of a stochastic process multiplied by a weighting function
Related Questions in BROWNIAN-MOTION
- Compute the covariance of $W_t$ and $B_t=\int_0^t\mathrm{sgn}(W)dW$, for a Brownian motion $W$
- Why has $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s$ the same distribution as $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s-B_t$ for a Brownian motion $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$?
- Identity related to Brownian motion
- 4th moment of a Wiener stochastic integral?
- Optional Stopping Theorem for martingales
- Discontinuous Brownian Motion
- Sample path of Brownian motion Hölder continuous?
- Polar Brownian motion not recovering polar Laplacian?
- Uniqueness of the parameters of an Ito process, given initial and terminal conditions
- $dX_t=\alpha X_t \,dt + \sqrt{X_t} \,dW_t, $ with $X_0=x_0,\,\alpha,\sigma>0.$ Compute $E[X_t] $ and $E[Y]$ for $Y=\lim_{t\to\infty}e^{-\alpha t}X_t$
Related Questions in MARTINGALES
- CLT for Martingales
- Find Expected Value of Martingale $X_n$
- Need to find Conditions to get a (sub-)martingale
- Martingale conditional expectation
- Sum of two martingales
- Discrete martingale stopping time
- Optional Stopping Theorem for martingales
- Prove that the following is a martingale
- Are all martingales uniformly integrable
- Cross Variation of stochatic integrals
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First, since the BM will eventually move arbitrarily far from the origin, we have $\limsup\lvert B_t + z \rvert = \infty$, so if $\lvert{B_0 + z \rvert} < r$ for any integral point $z$ then we are done by IVT.
Now suppose $\lvert{B_0 + z \rvert} \geq r$ for any integral point $z$. It suffices to prove that there exists an integer $n$ such that $\lvert B_n + z\rvert \leq r$. To show this, note that conditioned on $B_{n - 1} = x$, $B_n$ follows a normal distribution with mean $x$ and covariance matrix $I$. Under this distribution, the probability that $\lvert B_n + z\rvert \leq r$ for some integral $z$ is at least $\epsilon(r)$ for some constant $\epsilon(r) > 0$ (You can consider the sphere closest to $x$). Thus, for any $x$, $$\mathbb{P}(\forall z \in \mathbb{Z}^3, \lvert B_n + z\rvert \geq r \vert B_{n - 1} = x) \leq 1 - \epsilon(r).$$ Now taking the product with respect to $n$ gives the desired claim.