I don't understand if by saying there are $k$ alternating quantifiers on the variables $x_1$,$x_2$...$x_k$, It means we quantify ALL variables (there are only $k$ variables in the SAT formula) or just $k$ of them (so there can be more than $k$ variables) For example, for $\Sigma_1^\text{P}$-SAT, the clause has to be with only one variable who is quantified? It seems like there have to be some free variables left (not under quantifiers) but I'm not sure. (I know TQBF demands no free variables.) Thanks.
2026-03-26 23:11:46.1774566706
$\Sigma_k^\text{P}$−SAT definition is not clear to me
363 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DEFINITION
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- If a set is open, does it mean that every point is an interior point?
- What does $a^b$ mean in the definition of a cartesian closed category?
- $\lim_{n\to \infty}\sum_{j=0}^{[n/2]} \frac{1}{n} f\left( \frac{j}{n}\right)$
- Definition of "Normal topological space"
- How to verify $(a,b) = (c,d) \implies a = c \wedge b = d$ naively
- Why wolfram alpha assumed $ x>0$ as a domain of definition for $x^x $?
- Showing $x = x' \implies f(x) = f(x')$
- Inferior limit when t decreases to 0
- Is Hilbert space a Normed Space or a Inner Product Space? Or it have to be both at the same time?
Related Questions in COMPUTATIONAL-COMPLEXITY
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- Proving big theta notation?
- Little oh notation
- proving sigma = BigTheta (BigΘ)
- sources about SVD complexity
- Is all Linear Programming (LP) problems solvable in Polynomial time?
- growth rate of $f(x)= x^{1/7}$
- Unclear Passage in Cook's Proof of SAT NP-Completeness: Why The Machine M Should Be Modified?
- Minimum Matching on the Minimum Triangulation
- How to find the average case complexity of Stable marriage problem(Gale Shapley)?
Related Questions in QUANTIFIERS
- Show formula which does not have quantifier elimination in theory of infinite equivalence relations.
- Prove or disprove: $\exists x \forall y \,\,\varphi \models \forall y \exists x \,\ \varphi$
- Variables, Quantifiers, and Logic
- Express least and greatest fixed point using predicate and quantifiers
- Nested Quantifiers - Excluding Self
- Logical Equivalences Involving Quantifiers
- Translating Propositional Functions
- Valid Set builder notations for simple set.
- Explanation about quantifier sequence ∀x∃y and ∃y∀x
- Contrapositive of a quantified statement
Related Questions in SATISFIABILITY
- How to prove that 3-CNF is satisfiable using Hall's marriage theorem?
- validity reduction between FOL fragments
- Reduction 3SAT to Subset Sum
- Is $\forall_x\forall_y\forall_z\Big(P(x,x)\wedge(P(x,z)\implies\big(P(x,y)\vee P(y,z)\big)\Big)\implies\exists_x\forall_y P(x,y)$ tautology?
- How to I correctly specify the following set of sets of edges of a graph
- First Order Logic - unsatisfiable set of formulas
- First Order Logic - Logical Consequence and Paradox
- Divide and conquer SAT Solver
- Integer Programming (non $0-1$) Reduction to show $NP$ Completeness
- Induction on formulas for substitution
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There are no unquantified variables in SAT. If no quantifiers are explicitly given, the variables default to being existentially quantified.
When $k$ alternations is spoken of in reference to quantified boolean formulas, it refers to the number of groups of variables quantified by $\exists$ or $\forall$, not the number of variables themselves. So for $\Sigma_1^\text{P}$-SAT there is one group of quantified variables, not one variable.