I have only seen the real plane to be defined as $\mathbb R \times \mathbb R$.
In Euclidean geometry, the origin does not play any central role, but in this set theoretic definition, it does. Is there a way to define the real plane in a way that does not give any special importance to the origin, that is, is there a way to defined the real plane without using coordinates (or products)?
Euclid never defined the plane in his elements, and indeed never used numbers to measure length, angles, or area. In this sense, the Euclidean plane is not the same as the Cartesian plane. Euclid used a plane to mean a flat, two-dimensional surface that extends infinitely far, independent of numerical values. This definition gives no importance to the origin, as indeed there is no origin.