Reading a paper I've come across the following functional equation for unknown CDF's $F_1, F_2$ of centered probability distributions $\mu_1, \mu_2$ with variance $1$: $$F^{-1}(G_2(x+y)) = F_1^{-1}(G_1(x))+ F_2^{-1}(G_1(y))\qquad \text{for all} \ (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2$$ where $G_i$ is the CDF of a centered gaussian with Variance $i$ and $F$ is the CDF of the convolution $\mu_1 \ast \mu_2$. The unique solution is actually $F_1 = F_2 = G_1$ but I've not been able to proof that. I (think I) can show that $F_1 = F_2$: $$F_1^{-1}(G_1(x))+ F_2^{-1}(G_1(y)) = F^{-1}(G_2(x+y)) = F^{-1}(G_2(y+x)) = F_1^{-1}(G_1(y))+ F_2^{-1}(G_1(x))$$ so $$F_1^{-1}(G_1(x)) - F_2^{-1}(G_1(x)) = F_1^{-1}(G_1(y)) - F_2^{-1}(G_1(y))$$ which means, that $F_1^{-1}(G_1(x)) - F_2^{-1}(G_1(x))$ is constant, since the right-hand side does not depend on $x$. If the difference was not $0$ then either $\mu_1$ or $\mu_2$ is not centered since, $\mathbb{E}[\mu_i] = \int_0^1 F_i^{-1}(y)dy$, so $F_1 = F_2$.
Is this argument correct? How can I proceed to show uniqueness of solution?
You can find the paper here - the functional equation is part of the proof of Theorem 2 on page 49.
$$F^{-1}(G_2(x+y)) = F_1^{-1}(G_1(x))+ F_2^{-1}(G_1(y))$$
$$\text{let } h_1(x)=\int_0^tF_1^{-1}(G_1(xt))dt $$
$$\text{let } h_2(y)=\int_0^tF_2^{-1}(G_1(yt))dt $$
$$\text{let } h(x+y)=\int_0^tF^{-1}(G_1(xt+yt))dt $$
$$ \text{it is easily seen that $h_i(x)=\frac{\int_0^xF_i^{-1}(G_1(u))du}{x}$} \text{ ,it is continuous}$$
$$h_1(x)+h_2(y)=h(x+y) \text{ holds everywhere}$$
$$h_1(x)+h_2(0)=h(x)$$
$$h_1(0)+h_2(x)=h(x)$$
$$h_1(x)+h_2(0)=h_1(0)+h_2(x)$$
$$\text{The derivative: } h_1'(x)=h_2'(x)$$
$$xh_1'(x)+h_1(x)=F_1^{-1}(G_1(x))$$
$$xh_2'(x)+h_2(x)=F_2^{-1}(G_1(x))$$
The equations imply $$h_1(x)-h_2(x) \text{ is constant}$$
$$F_1^{-1}(G_1(x))-F_2^{-1}(G_1(x)) \text{ is constant}$$
$$h(x)-h_1(x) \text{ is constant}$$
$$h(x)-h_2(x) \text{ is constant}$$