Q. If $y(x)=1+\displaystyle\int_0^x e^{-(x+t)}y(t)\,dt,$ then $y(1)$ equals:
(a) $0$, (b) $1$, (c) $2$, (d) $3$.
I tried the successive approximations method (starting with $y_0=0$), conversion to a DE, and finding the resolvent kernel. But none of them worked out for me! So, I thought of applying the Laplace transform technique: \begin{align} \mathscr{L}[y(x)]&=\mathscr{L}[1] + \mathscr{L}\left[\int_0^x e^{-(x+t)}y(t)\,dt\right]\\ &=\frac 1s + \frac 1s \mathscr{L}[e^{-(x+t)}y(t)] \end{align} In $\mathscr{L}[e^{-(x+t)}y(t)]$, both $x$ and $t$ are variables. Is it even possible to find $\mathscr{L}[e^{-(x+t)}y(t)]$ ?
Observe that $y\ge 0.$ Indeed we have $y(0)=1.$ Let $x_0$ be the smallest point such that $y(x_0)=0.$ Then $y(t)>0$ for $0\le t<x_0$ and $$0=y(x_0)=1+\int\limits_0^{x_0}e^{-(x_0+t)}y(t)\,dt >1$$ a contradiction. The positivity of $y$ implies $y(x)>1$ for $x>0.$ Next we will show that $$y(x)<{4\over 3},\quad x\ge 0\quad (*)$$ Assume for a contradiction that $(*)$ fails. Let $x_1$ be the smallest point in $[0,1]$ such that $y(x_1)={4\over 3}.$ Then $x_1>0,$ $y(t)<{4\over 3}$ for $0\le t\le x_1$ and $${4\over 3}=y(x_1)=1+\int\limits_0^{x_1}e^{-(x_1+t)}y(t)\,dt\le 1+{4\over 3}e^{-x_1}\int\limits_0^{x_1}e^{-t}\,dt\\ = 1+{4\over 3}e^{-x_1}(1-e^{-x_1})={4\over 3}-{1\over 3}\left (2e^{-x_1}-1\right )^2< {4\over 3}$$ a contradiction.
Summarizing we have obtained $1<y(x)<{4\over 3}$ for any $x>0.$ In particular there holds $1<y(1)<{4\over 3}.$