Spivak's Calculus, Chapter 10 on Differentiation, problem 32:
- What is $f^{(k)}(x)$ if
a)$f(x) = \frac{1}{(x-1)^n}$
*b) $f(x)=\frac{1}{x^2-1}$
My question regards part $b)$.
$a)$ can be solved quite easily if you use the conclusion of a previous problem (30), which shows
If $f(x)=x^{-n}$ for $n \in \mathbb{N}$ then
$$f^{(k)}(x)=(-1)^k\frac{(n+k-1)!}{(n-1)!}x^{-n-k}\tag{1}$$
$$g(x)=f(x+1)=x^{-n}$$
$$g^{(k)}(x)=f^{(k)}(x+1)=(-1)^k\frac{(n+k-1)!}{(n-1)!}x^{-n-k}$$
$$g^{(k)}(x-1)=f^{(k)}(x)=\frac{d^{k} \frac{1}{(x-1)^n}}{dx^k}=(-1)^k\frac{(n+k-1)!}{(n-1)!}(x-1)^{-n-k}\tag{2}$$
Similarly, we can show that
$$\frac{d^k \frac{1}{(x+1)^n}}{dx^k}=(-1)^k\frac{(n+k-1)!}{(n-1)!}(x+1)^{-n-k}\tag{3}$$
Now for part b).
We can rewrite $f(x)=\frac{1}{x^2-1}$ in two different ways:
$$f(x)=\frac{1}{x+1}\cdot \frac{1}{x-1}\tag{4}$$
$$f(x)=\frac{1}{2} \left ( \frac{1}{x-1}-\frac{1}{x+1} \right )\tag{5}$$
Spivak's solution manual differentiates $(5)$.
$$f^{(k)}(x)=\frac{1}{2} \left ( \frac{d^k \frac{1}{(x-1)^n}}{dx^k} - \frac{d^k \frac{1}{(x+1)^n}}{dx^k} \right )$$
So we can just sub in $(2)$ and $(3)$:
$$f^{(k)}(x)=\frac{1}{2}(-1)^k\frac{(n+k-1)!}{(n-1)!}((x-1)^{-n-k}-(x+1)^{-n-k})\tag{6}$$
My question is: can we apply Leibniz's formula to differentiate $(4)$?
Leibniz's formula tells us that
$$(f \cdot g)^{(n)}(x)=\sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}f^{(k)}(x) \cdot g^{(n-k)}(x)$$
If we apply this to $f(x)=\frac{1}{x+1}\cdot \frac{1}{x-1}$ then we get
$$f^{(n)}(x)=\sum_{k=0}^n \left [(-1)^k \frac{k!}{0!}(x-1)^{-1-k} \right ] \left [(-1)^{n-k} \frac{(n+k)!}{0!}(x+1)^{-1-k} \right ]$$
$$= \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k}(-1)^nk! (n+k)! (x^2-1)^{-1-k}\tag{7}$$
Differentiating the sum in $(5)$ was the easier route. But is the calculation of differentiating $(4)$ correct? Is one route better than the other?
The calculation can be done in both ways. On the one hand we have
\begin{align*} \color{blue}{f^{(k)}(x)}&=\left(\frac{1}{x^2-1}\right)^{(k)}\\ &=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{x-1}-\frac{1}{x+1}\right)^{(k)}\\ &=\frac{1}{2}\left(\left((x-1)^{-1}\right)^{(k)}-\left((x+1)^{-1}\right)^{(k)}\right)\\ &=\frac{1}{2}\left((-1)(-2)\cdots(-1-(k-1))(x-1)^{-1-k}\right.\\ &\qquad\qquad\left.-(-1)(-2)\cdots(-1-(k-1))(x+1)^{-1-k}\right)\\ &=\frac{1}{2}\left((-1)^kk!(x-1)^{-1-k}-(-1)^kk!(x+1)^{k+1}\right)\\ &\,\,\color{blue}{=\frac{(-1)^kk!}{2}\left(\frac{1}{(x-1)^{k+1}}-\frac{1}{(x+1)^{k+1}}\right)}\tag{1} \end{align*}
On the other hand using the general Leibniz rule we obtain
Obviously the first way is more convenient, since we obtain immediately the closed form (1). In (2) we have to cope with a sum and to apply the formula for finite geometric sums till we finally obtain the same form as in (1).