In the fields of representation theory and quantum algebra, we often start with, for example, some $\mathbf{C}$-algebra $A$ and study a quantization of $A$ by adjoining an indeterminate $q$, or sometimes $v$, to twist the multiplication in $A$. Now, in different contexts I've seen this quantized algebra regarded as an algebra over any of $$ \mathbf{Z}[q] \quad \mathbf{Z}\left[q,q^{-1}\right] \quad \mathbf{Q}\left[q,q^{-1}\right] \quad \mathbf{Q}\left(q\right) \quad \mathbf{C}\left[q,q^{-1}\right] \quad \mathbf{C}\left(q\right) . $$ Is there any overarching motivation/intuition behind which ring to consider as the base ring of our quantized version of $A$? Like, is there anything clever to be said here that I'm not picking up on, or do researchers/authors simply use the smallest one they need at the time?
2025-01-13 02:15:49.1736734549
Studying quantized algebras, what motivates the choice of base ring?
80 Views Asked by Mike Pierce https://math.techqa.club/user/mike-pierce/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- Conjugation preserves representation?
- linear representations, usual assumption
- Example of representation
- Simultaneously diagonalize the regular representation of C2 (+) C2 (+) C2.
- In what sense are the linear characters among the irreducible characters
- representation of sym^2(V)
- Proof that the induced class function $\theta^G$ is a character if $\theta$ is a representation on subgroup
- Character representation of right regular representation as sum of irreducible characters
- For simple $\mathbb C[G]$-modules is the representation unique
- Formulas give irreducible representation, $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$.
Related Questions in QUANTUM-GROUPS
- Relation between quantum affine algebra $U_q(\widehat{sl_2})$ and the affine Lie algebra $\widehat{sl_2}$?
- Relation between Yangian $Y(sl_2)$ and quantum affine algebra $U_q(\widehat{sl_2})$.
- Graphical calculus for braided Hopf algebras
- Trace of Product of Powers of $A$ and $A^\ast$
- Is the category of all finite dimensional modules of $g$ equivalent to the category of all finite dimensional modules of $U_q(g)$?
- The functor from $sl_2-mod$ to $U_q(sl_2)-mod$.
- Notation in quantum groups.
- GNS construction of a weight
- How to compute Casimir elements of $g \otimes g$?
- Relations between Lie algebras and Lie coalgebras.
Related Questions in QUANTUM-CALCULUS
- Cannot solve this integral used in quantum chemistry
- Studying quantized algebras, why introduce $q^{1/2}$ instead of just $q$?
- Studying quantized algebras, what motivates the choice of base ring?
- Why is $q$ sometimes a complex number, but other times a prime power?
- Bound for deformed binomial coefficients
- What is the way to change the limits of q-integration of a double integral
- Calculate density matrix by a given observable
- Connection between the quantum calculus and fractional calculus developed by Riemann-Liouvelle, Caputo and others?
- Ejemplos de la integral de Jackson (Examples of Jackson's Integral)
- q-differentiability in $R_q$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
I'm not an expert but here is what I understood :
First I believe there is not much difference for $\Bbb Q(q)$ vs $\Bbb C(q)$.
$\Bbb C(q)$ vs $\Bbb C[q,q^{-1}]$ : the nice thing with $\Bbb C(q)$ is that it's a field, and the nice feature with $\Bbb C[q,q^{-1}]$ is that there is an "evaluation morphism" $ev_a : \Bbb C[q,q^{-1}] \to \Bbb C$ for any complex number $a \in \Bbb C \backslash \{0,1,-1\}$. ($ev_a$ is not defined at $f \in \Bbb C(q)$ if $f$ has a pole at $a$.
$\Bbb Z[q,q^{-1}]$ is especially useful when you are dealing with root of unity. In this case Lusztig (but I believe it was introduced by Kostant in the context of Lie algebra of positive characteristic) introduced a nice form for quantum group involving divided powers, which totally disappear when extending to e.g $\Bbb Q(q)$. With divided power the representation theory of quantum groups at root of $1$ is easier and look a bit more familiar.
There are also other coefficients, for example $\Bbb Q[q]_{(q)}$ (localisation) is used a lot in the context of crystal basis, or Andersen-Polo-Kexin uses $\Bbb Z[v]_{\mathfrak m}$ where $\mathfrak m = (v,p)$ to be able to relate quantum groups with hyperalgebra of algebraic groups.