In the fields of representation theory and quantum algebra, we often start with, for example, some $\mathbf{C}$-algebra $A$ and study a quantization of $A$ by adjoining an indeterminate $q$, or sometimes $v$, to twist the multiplication in $A$. Now, in different contexts I've seen this quantized algebra regarded as an algebra over any of $$ \mathbf{Z}[q] \quad \mathbf{Z}\left[q,q^{-1}\right] \quad \mathbf{Q}\left[q,q^{-1}\right] \quad \mathbf{Q}\left(q\right) \quad \mathbf{C}\left[q,q^{-1}\right] \quad \mathbf{C}\left(q\right) . $$ Is there any overarching motivation/intuition behind which ring to consider as the base ring of our quantized version of $A$? Like, is there anything clever to be said here that I'm not picking up on, or do researchers/authors simply use the smallest one they need at the time?
2026-04-12 22:30:40.1776033040
Studying quantized algebras, what motivates the choice of base ring?
79 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in QUANTUM-GROUPS
- Verma module $V(\lambda)$ of $U_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ is not simple $\implies$ $\lambda = \pm q^n$
- Structure of simple modules of $U_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ at a root of unity.
- What are $q$-deformations?
- Intuition behind the relation of commutative Hopf algebra and Groups
- Definition of the Quantum plane and the Yang Baxter Equation
- Quantum invariants of 2-knots
- Integrable modules of quantum groups.
- Bogoliubov Transform
- Reference on correspondence between commutative Hopf Algebras and Groups
- What is the relation between crystals and crystal bases?
Related Questions in QUANTUM-CALCULUS
- q-derivative of binomial
- Intuition behind this q-binomial formula counting sums of subsets
- improper integrals in q-calculus
- Studying quantized algebras, why introduce $q^{1/2}$ instead of just $q$?
- Studying quantized algebras, what motivates the choice of base ring?
- Why is $q$ sometimes a complex number, but other times a prime power?
- Bound for deformed binomial coefficients
- q-differentiability in $R_q$
- What does the statement "x is a diagram of classical logics" mean?
- Asymptotic behavior of the minimum eigenvalue of a certain Gram matrix with linear independence
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm not an expert but here is what I understood :
First I believe there is not much difference for $\Bbb Q(q)$ vs $\Bbb C(q)$.
$\Bbb C(q)$ vs $\Bbb C[q,q^{-1}]$ : the nice thing with $\Bbb C(q)$ is that it's a field, and the nice feature with $\Bbb C[q,q^{-1}]$ is that there is an "evaluation morphism" $ev_a : \Bbb C[q,q^{-1}] \to \Bbb C$ for any complex number $a \in \Bbb C \backslash \{0,1,-1\}$. ($ev_a$ is not defined at $f \in \Bbb C(q)$ if $f$ has a pole at $a$.
$\Bbb Z[q,q^{-1}]$ is especially useful when you are dealing with root of unity. In this case Lusztig (but I believe it was introduced by Kostant in the context of Lie algebra of positive characteristic) introduced a nice form for quantum group involving divided powers, which totally disappear when extending to e.g $\Bbb Q(q)$. With divided power the representation theory of quantum groups at root of $1$ is easier and look a bit more familiar.
There are also other coefficients, for example $\Bbb Q[q]_{(q)}$ (localisation) is used a lot in the context of crystal basis, or Andersen-Polo-Kexin uses $\Bbb Z[v]_{\mathfrak m}$ where $\mathfrak m = (v,p)$ to be able to relate quantum groups with hyperalgebra of algebraic groups.