Studying quantized algebras, what motivates the choice of base ring?

80 Views Asked by At

In the fields of representation theory and quantum algebra, we often start with, for example, some $\mathbf{C}$-algebra $A$ and study a quantization of $A$ by adjoining an indeterminate $q$, or sometimes $v$, to twist the multiplication in $A$. Now, in different contexts I've seen this quantized algebra regarded as an algebra over any of $$ \mathbf{Z}[q] \quad \mathbf{Z}\left[q,q^{-1}\right] \quad \mathbf{Q}\left[q,q^{-1}\right] \quad \mathbf{Q}\left(q\right) \quad \mathbf{C}\left[q,q^{-1}\right] \quad \mathbf{C}\left(q\right) . $$ Is there any overarching motivation/intuition behind which ring to consider as the base ring of our quantized version of $A$? Like, is there anything clever to be said here that I'm not picking up on, or do researchers/authors simply use the smallest one they need at the time?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

I'm not an expert but here is what I understood :

First I believe there is not much difference for $\Bbb Q(q)$ vs $\Bbb C(q)$.

$\Bbb C(q)$ vs $\Bbb C[q,q^{-1}]$ : the nice thing with $\Bbb C(q)$ is that it's a field, and the nice feature with $\Bbb C[q,q^{-1}]$ is that there is an "evaluation morphism" $ev_a : \Bbb C[q,q^{-1}] \to \Bbb C$ for any complex number $a \in \Bbb C \backslash \{0,1,-1\}$. ($ev_a$ is not defined at $f \in \Bbb C(q)$ if $f$ has a pole at $a$.

$\Bbb Z[q,q^{-1}]$ is especially useful when you are dealing with root of unity. In this case Lusztig (but I believe it was introduced by Kostant in the context of Lie algebra of positive characteristic) introduced a nice form for quantum group involving divided powers, which totally disappear when extending to e.g $\Bbb Q(q)$. With divided power the representation theory of quantum groups at root of $1$ is easier and look a bit more familiar.

There are also other coefficients, for example $\Bbb Q[q]_{(q)}$ (localisation) is used a lot in the context of crystal basis, or Andersen-Polo-Kexin uses $\Bbb Z[v]_{\mathfrak m}$ where $\mathfrak m = (v,p)$ to be able to relate quantum groups with hyperalgebra of algebraic groups.