In the case of an elliptic curve $E$ defined over a field $K$, I know that there is a good definition of the so-called Tate module, for every prime $p$, which is the $\mathbb{Z}_p$-module $T_p(E)=\underset{\underset{n}{\longleftarrow}}{\lim}E[p^n](K^s)$, where $E[p^n]$ is the subscheme of $E$ representing its $p$-torsion, and $K^s$ is the separable closure of $K$. I know that this object satisfies very good properties, e.g. it realizes a representation of the Galois Group of $K$. I also know that, under suitable hypothesis, $T_p(E)$ can be used to describe all the possible isogenies between $E$ and itself (or another elliptic curve). Now, I learned via Katz-Mazur book on Arithmetic moduli of Elliptic Curves, that it is possible to define an elliptic curve over arbitrary base rings, and even schemes. I was wondering, but I didn't find any good reference, wether or not it is possible to define a kind of global Tate module. In fact, consider $R$ a ring, and $E/R$ an elliptic curve, i.e. a proper, smooth scheme over $R$ equipped with a zero section, and whose fibers are elliptic curves in the usual sense. Then it is proved in Katz-Mazur that this object again comes equipped with a Group structure, so, is it is meaningful to consider the $p^n$-torsion for varying $n$. Is it possible to define a kind of relative version of the Tate module? My guess is to define it as a functor $T_p(E)$, which sends any $R$-algebra $A$ to $T_p(E)(A)=\underset{\underset{n}{\longleftarrow}}{\lim}E[p^n](A)$. Clearly this defines a sheaf over the category of $R$-Algebras, being an inverse limit of sheaves. Is it representable? And, is there any beautiful and known result about it? For example situations under which it classifies isogenies of elliptic curves over $R$? Thanks a lot for any suggestion or reference!
2026-03-24 23:55:07.1774396507
Tate module of an elliptic curve.
749 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in ELLIPTIC-CURVES
- Can we find $n$ Pythagorean triples with a common leg for any $n$?
- Solution of $X^5=5 Y (Y+1)+1$ in integers.
- Why does birational equivalence preserve group law in elliptic curves?
- CM elliptic curves and isogeny
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- Difficulty understanding Hartshorne Theorem IV.4.11
- Elementary Elliptic Curves
- Flex points are invariant under isomorphism
- The Mordell equation $x^2 + 11 = y^3$.
- How do we know that reducing $E/K$ commutes with the addition law for $K$ local field
Related Questions in SCHEMES
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- Do torsion-free $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules on curves have dimension one?
- $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ is the sections of Spec $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ minus the origin?
- Finitely generated $k-$algebras of regular functions on an algebraic variety
- Is every open affine subscheme of an algebraic $k-$variety an affine $k-$variety?
- Scheme Theoretic Image (Hartshorne Ex.II.3.11.d)
- Is this a closed embedding of schemes?
- Adjunction isomorphism in algebraic geometry
- Closed connected subset of $\mathbb{P}_k^1$
- Why can't closed subschemes be defined in an easier way?
Related Questions in ARITHMETIC-GEOMETRY
- Showing that a Severi-Brauer Variety with a point is trivial
- Definition of scheme defined over a ring A
- Galois representation on Tate module of a twist of an elliptic curve
- What is the difference between algebraic number theory, arithmetic geometry and diophantine geometry?
- Questions about Zeta Function of Singular Plane Curve
- Brauer group of global fields
- Structure of étale maps
- Unipotent Groups and Torsors
- why is multiplication by n surjective on an abelian variety
- Poincare duality compatible with the definition of compactly supported cohomology in etale cohomology?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I don't know why this was never answered.
Let $f:A\to S$ be an abelian scheme and let $\ell$ be invertible on $S$. Then, you can consider the lisse $\mathbb{Z}_\ell$-sheaf $T_\ell A:=(R^1 f_\ast \mathbb{Z}_\ell)^\vee$. This is the relative analogue of the Tate module. For example, by smooth proper base change we have for every $s\in S$ an isomorphism of $\mathrm{Gal}(\overline{k(s)}/k(s))$-modules
$$(R^1 f_\ast \mathbb{Z}_\ell)^\vee_{\overline{s}}\cong H^1_\mathrm{et}(A_{\overline{k(s)}},\mathbb{Z}_\ell)^\vee\cong T_\ell A_{\overline{k(s)}}$$
Note that if $S$ is connected, then you can fully faithfully identify the lisse $\mathbb{Z}_\ell$-sheaf $T_\ell A$ on $S$ with the continuous $\mathbb{Z}_\ell[\pi_1^\mathrm{et}(S,\overline{s})]$-module $T_\ell A_{\overline{k(s)}}$. Similarly, we can think of the rational analogue of the Tate module $V_\ell A:=(R^1 f_\ast\mathbb{Q}_\ell)^\vee$ which is a lisse $\mathbb{Q}_\ell$-sheaf on $S$. Again, we can fully faithfully identify this object with the continuous $\mathbb{Q}_\ell[\pi_1^\mathrm{et}(S,\overline{s})]$-module $V_\ell A_{k(\overline{s})}$.
I think the kind of desired theorem that you're after is the fact that quasi-isogenies out of $A$ (up to equivalence) can be classified by $\pi_1^\mathrm{et}(S,\overline{s})$-invariant open compact subgroups of $V_\ell A_{\overline{k(s)}}$. Is this what you were interested in, or did you mean something else when you were discussing isogenies?