Given three independent random variables $X, Y, Z$, is it true that $$\text{Cov}(\max(X,Y), \max(X, Z)) \leq C \cdot \text{Var}(X)?$$
I am thinking about the case where the $\text{Var}(Y)$ and $\text{Var}(Z)$ are much larger than $\text{Var}(X)$, so Cauchy-Schwartz inequality would not be useful here.
My gut feeling this should hold because of the independence. I tried a few conditioning. For example, we know $\max(X, Z)\perp Y$, so if we condition on $Y$, we have $$\text{Cov}(\max(X,Y), \max(X, Z)) = \mathbb{E}[\text{Cov}_{\mathcal{F}_Y}(\max(X,Y), \max(X, Z))].$$ I also tried conditioning on $X$, but these did not lead to anything at this moment.
Write $\widetilde{Y} = \max\{Y, X\}$ and $\widetilde{Z} = \max\{Z, X\}$ for brevity. Then by the law of total covariance,
\begin{align*} \mathbf{Cov}(\widetilde{Y}, \widetilde{Z}) &= \mathbf{E}[\overbrace{ \mathbf{Cov}(\widetilde{Y}, \widetilde{Z} \mid X) }^{=0}] + \mathbf{Cov}(\mathbf{E}[\widetilde{Y} \mid X], \mathbf{E}[\widetilde{Z} \mid X]) \\ &= \mathbf{Cov}(f(X), g(X)), \end{align*}
where $f(\cdot)$ and $g(\cdot)$ are defined by
\begin{align*} f(x) &= \mathbf{E}[\widetilde{Y} \mid X = x] = \mathbf{E}[\max\{Y, x\}], \\ g(x) &= \mathbf{E}[\widetilde{Z} \mid X = x] = \mathbf{E}[\max\{Z, x\}]. \end{align*}
Now we note that both $f$ and $g$ are $1$-Lipschitz, since $x \mapsto \max\{y, x\}$ is $1$-Lipschitz for any $y \in \mathbb{R}$. To make use of this observation, we need the following result:
So by the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and the above lemma,
\begin{align*} \mathbf{Cov}(\widetilde{Y}, \widetilde{Z}) \leq \sqrt{\mathbf{Var}(f(X))\mathbf{Var}(g(X))} \leq \mathbf{Var}(X). \end{align*}
Therefore OP's claim holds with $C = 1$.
Addendum. By the Harris inequality and the monotonicity of $f$ and $g$, we also have
$$ \mathbf{Cov}(\widetilde{Y}, \widetilde{Z}) \geq 0. $$
This shows that the magnitude of the covariance $\mathbf{Cov}(\widetilde{Y}, \widetilde{Z})$ is bounded by the variance of $X$.