I want to derive the unit vector $N(s)=\dfrac{T'(s)}{\|T'(S)\|}$, where $T'(s)$ is the derivative of the tangent unit vector, how can I derive this vector? Thanks!
2026-03-31 15:44:53.1774971893
The derivative of the normal unit vector
246 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRY
- Point in, on or out of a circle
- Find all the triangles $ABC$ for which the perpendicular line to AB halves a line segment
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- Asymptotes of hyperbola
- Finding the range of product of two distances.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Position of point with respect to hyperbola
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- Show that the asymptotes of an hyperbola are its tangents at infinity points
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL
- In a directional slope field, how can a straight line be a solution to a differential equation?
- The Equation of Motion of a Snowball
- Supremum of the operator norm of Jacobian matrix
- Directional continuous derivative on vectors of a base implies differentiability in $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Need explanation for intuition behind rewriting $dy$ in terms of $dx$
- Does the double integrative of d^{2}x make sense from a mathematical point of view?
- Functional with 4th grade characteristic equation
- need to equate MATLAB and MATHEMATICA solutions
- Formula for Curvature
- Showing that $\Psi(f) = \int^{b}_{a}\phi(f(x))dx$ is differentiable.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm not sure Omar the OP meant "differentiate" or simply "derive" as in "show that such-and-such is the case. I assumed the former:
If the context is $\Bbb R^2$, i.e., the curves lie in the plane, then since $N(s)$ and $\kappa$ are defined via
$T'(s) = \kappa N(s), \tag{1}$
together with the requirement that $\Vert N(s) \Vert = 1$, where $\kappa$ is the curvature of the curve, it follows that
$N'(s) = -\kappa T(s); \tag{2}$
you don't have to do any more work once you've got $T'(s)$; you're done. A complete explanation may be found in my answer to this question.
If you're in $\Bbb R^3$, or even $\Bbb R^n$, $n > 3$ (1) still defines $\kappa$ and $N(s)$ in this case, and we can use it to write $N'(s)$ via
$T''(s) = \kappa' N(s) + \kappa N'(s), \tag{3}$
provided we can compute $\kappa'(s)$. But
$\kappa(s) = \Vert T'(s) \Vert = \langle T'(s), T'(s) \rangle^{\frac{1}{2}}, \tag{4}$
so that
$\kappa'(s) = \frac{1}{2}\langle T'(s), T'(s) \rangle^{-\frac{1}{2}}\langle T'(s), T'(s) \rangle' = \frac{1}{2}\kappa^{-1}\langle T'(s), T'(s) \rangle'. \tag{5}$
Now
$\langle T'(s), T'(s) \rangle' = \langle T''(s), T'(s) \rangle + \langle T'(s), T''(s) \rangle = 2\langle T'(s), T''(s) \rangle, \tag{6}$
so combining this with (5) yields
$\kappa'(s) = \langle T'(s), T'(s) \rangle^{-\frac{1}{2}}\langle T'(s), T''(s) \rangle, \tag{7}$
and now using (1) and (4) we see that
$\kappa'(s) = \kappa^{-1}\langle \kappa N(s), T''(s) \rangle = \langle N(s), T''(s) \rangle. \tag{8}$
(8) may be used in (3) which, after a little re-arranging, becomes
$N'(s) = \kappa^{-1}(T''(s) - \langle N(s), T''(s) \rangle N(s)). \tag{9}$
That's most likely how I'd do it, in any event. A "recipe" or set of directions for obtaining $N'(s)$ based on (9) might read:
Given $T(s)$,
1.) Differentiate $T(s)$ to obtain $T'(s) = kN$; this gives $\kappa$ and $N$;
2.) Differentiate $T'(s)$ to obtain $T''(s)$;
3.) From the data derived in steps (1) and (2) above, algebraically calculate, in accordance with equation (9), $N'(s) = \kappa^{-1}(T''(s) - \langle N(s), T''(s) \rangle N(s))$.
4.) Halt.
Of course, it is also possible to compute $N'(s)$ directly from (1) by writing
$N(s) = \kappa^{-1}T'(s), \tag{10}$
reducing it to simplest terms "algebraically", and then differentiate the resulting expression directly. But it's not clear that it would be less work the above prescpition; indeed, my personal experience shows it would often be more. Addionally but not extraneously, the nice thing about (9) is that it breaks out everything in geometric terms; indeed, $T''(s) - \langle N(s), T''(s) \rangle N(s)$ is the projection of $T''(s)$ onto $N^\perp(s)$, the subspace normal to $N(s)$. So (9) has a nice interpretation, geometrically speaking: it says that the derivative of $N(s)$ with respect to $s$ is the component of $T''(s)$ normal to $N(s)$, divided by $\kappa$. One can of course assign similar geometric interpretations to most of the other equations occurring in the above discussion.
Of course all of the above is subject to the usual caveats concerning the vanishing of $\kappa$; we must generally assume we are working in a neighborhood where $\kappa(s) \ne 0$, since $N(s)$ can be defined, and the ensuing divisions by $\kappa$ are permitted.
Hope this helps. Cheerio,
and of course,
Fiat Lux!!!