I have been able to find the answer via exhaustion. I defined $a\le b\le c\le d\le e\le f$ as the primes and solved an inequality for each variable. The answer is $2,2,3,3,7,67$. However, the number of cases to solve got quite large and I was wondering if there is any neat solution to this problem.
2026-04-03 21:48:28.1775252908
The product of which 6 primes is 201-times larger than their sum?
124 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NUMBER-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Show that $(x,y,z)$ is a primitive Pythagorean triple then either $x$ or $y$ is divisible by $3$.
- About polynomial value being perfect power.
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- What is the smallest integer $N>2$, such that $x^5+y^5 = N$ has a rational solution?
- Integer from base 10 to base 2
- How do I show that any natural number of this expression is a natural linear combination?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
Related Questions in PRIME-NUMBERS
- New prime number
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- How do I prove this question involving primes?
- What exactly is the definition of Carmichael numbers?
- I'm having a problem interpreting and starting this problem with primes.
- Decimal expansion of $\frac{1}{p}$: what is its period?
- Multiplying prime numbers
- Find the number of relatively prime numbers from $10$ to $100$
- A congruence with the Euler's totient function and sum of divisors function
- Squares of two coprime numbers
Related Questions in ALTERNATIVE-PROOF
- Are $[0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ homotopy equivalent?
- An isomorphism $f:G_1 \to G_2$ maps the identity of $G_1$ to the identity of $G_2$
- Simpler Derivation of $\sin \frac{\pi}{4} = \cos \frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$,
- inequality with arc length integral
- In how many ways can the basketball be passed between four people so that the ball comes back to $A$ after seven passes? (Use recursion)
- Deriving the gradient of the Augmented Lagrangian dual
- An irreducible Markov chain cannot have an absorbing state
- Clarifying a proof that a certain set is an algebra
- Dilogarithmic fashion: the case $(p,q)=(3,4)$ of $\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\text{Li}_p(x)\,\text{Li}_q(x)}{x^2}\,dx$
- Proof by contrapositive: $x^4 + 2x^2 - 2x \lt 0 \Rightarrow 0 \lt x \lt 1$
Related Questions in PRIME-FACTORIZATION
- For which natural numbers are $\phi(n)=2$?
- Fractions of the form $\frac{a}{k}\cdot\frac{b}{k}\cdot\frac{c}{k}\cdots=\frac{n}{k}$
- (Number of perfect powers ≤ n) ∼ $\sqrt{n}$?
- How do I solve complicated prime factorization problems? (Ex: 20711)
- Is there a pattern to addition of primesFactored numbers?
- Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic: Uniqueness Part of Proof
- Find a prime factor of $7999973$ without a calculator
- Proof verification: Let $gcd(x,y)=1$. If $xy$ is a perfect square, then $x$ and $y$ are perfect squares.
- An idea for approaching Brocard's problem ($n!+1=m^2$)
- Looking for complex roots of unity which also happen to be complex primes
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Start with the observation of J. W. Tanner that two of the primes must be $3,67$. Note that if all of the primes are odd, their product is odd, but their sum is even, so we can conclude that one of the primes must be $2$.
Restate the problem as $2\cdot 3\cdot 67\cdot p_1p_2p_3=201(p_1+p_2+p_3+72)$ from which $2\cdot p_1p_2p_3=(p_1+p_2+p_3+72)$. Once again, if all unidentified primes are odd then LHS is even but RHS is odd, so there is another factor of $2$ present. This yields $4\cdot p_1p_2=(p_1+p_2+74)$. We can quickly convince ourselves that $p_1\ne p_2$ and $p_1\equiv p_2 \bmod 4$.
The smallest pair of primes that are $\equiv 1 \bmod 4$ are $5,13$, but $4\cdot 5\cdot 13>5+13+74$ and looking at larger primes only makes the inequality greater. The smallest pair of primes that are $\equiv 3 \bmod 4$ are $3,7$, and this provides a solution. The next larger pair of primes that are $\equiv 3 \bmod 4$ are $7,11$, and also in this case, $4\cdot 7\cdot 11>7+11+74$ and looking at larger primes only makes the inequality greater. So the remaining primes are $3,7$.
The complete list is as OP found: $2,2,3,3,7,67$.