I am recently thinking of the following question (motivated by the splitting principle for vector bundles): Suppose $X$ is a projective smooth variety over an algebraically closed field $k$. Let \begin{equation} E_0\subsetneq E_1\subsetneq \cdots\subsetneq E_n \end{equation} be a sequence of vector bundles. By this I mean that each inclusion $E_i\subsetneq E_{i+1}$ realizes $E_i$ as a subbundle not only a subsheaf. Over $X$ there is no reason that $E_{i+1}\simeq E_i\oplus (E_{i+1}/E_i)$. Can we construct a projective variety $\pi: Y\to X$ such that \begin{equation} \pi^\ast E_{i+1}=\pi^\ast E_i\oplus \pi^\ast (E_{i+1}/E_i). \end{equation}
2026-03-25 23:09:30.1774480170
The Splitting Principle for Varieties
93 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in SCHEMES
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- Do torsion-free $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules on curves have dimension one?
- $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ is the sections of Spec $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ minus the origin?
- Finitely generated $k-$algebras of regular functions on an algebraic variety
- Is every open affine subscheme of an algebraic $k-$variety an affine $k-$variety?
- Scheme Theoretic Image (Hartshorne Ex.II.3.11.d)
- Is this a closed embedding of schemes?
- Adjunction isomorphism in algebraic geometry
- Closed connected subset of $\mathbb{P}_k^1$
- Why can't closed subschemes be defined in an easier way?
Related Questions in K-THEORY
- Confusion about relationship between operator $K$-theory and topological $K$-theory
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- An immediate result of fundamental theorem of algebraic $K$-theory.
- Opposite effective classes in a Grothendieck group
- Trivial K-theory implies trivial K-theory of hereditary corners?
- Are there examples of unital and nuclear $C^*$-algebras satisfying the UCT that are not groupoid algebras of an amenable etale groupoid?
- Algebraic $K_2$ as "universal receptacle"?
- How is $K(X\times S^2)$ a $K(X)$ module ?
- Traces on $K(H)$
- Adams operations and an artificial grading on K-theory
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No, this does not exist in general. For instance, let $X = \mathbb{P}^1$ and consider the tautological embedding $$ \phi \colon \mathcal{O}(-1) \hookrightarrow \mathcal{O} \oplus \mathcal{O}. $$ Assume $\pi \colon Y \to X$ is a projective surjective morphism such that $\pi^*(\phi)$ is a split embedding. Then there is an epimorphism $$ \mathcal{O}_Y \oplus \mathcal{O}_Y \cong \pi^*(\mathcal{O} \oplus \mathcal{O}) \to \pi^*\mathcal{O}(-1). $$ In particular, the line bundle $\pi^*\mathcal{O}(-1)$ is globally generated. On the other hand, its dual $\pi^*\mathcal{O}(1)$ is also globally generated (because $\mathcal{O}(1)$ is globally generated on $X$). But this is obviously impossible.