I am reading a textbook Mathematics for Physics. In page 126, the author defines two operators: $$L=-\partial_x^2+q(x)$$ $$P=\partial_x^3+a(x)\partial_x+\partial_x a(x)$$ Then the author continues to calculate the commutator, which as I understand has the same definition from ring theory: $$[P,L]=PL-LP$$ After some tedious calculations and setting $a(x)=-\frac 34 q(x)$, the following equation is reached. $$[P,L]=\frac 14 q'''-\frac 32 qq'$$ The part where I don't understand is, the author then writes: $$\frac {dL}{dt} = [P,L]$$ or, equivalently $$\dot q = \frac 14 q'''-\frac 32 qq'$$ I think I may lack specific knowledge on this part as why we can set the time derivative $\frac{dL}{dt} = [P,L]$ and what is the author trying to do?
2026-03-27 17:52:23.1774633943
Time derivative of the commutator of two operators $P,L$
127 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-OPERATORS
- Why is the differential operator equal to an integer in the case of trignometric equations?
- How to prove that inequality for every $f\in C^\infty_0(\Bbb{R})$.
- describe ring of derivation of continuous map on manifold
- Implicit Differentiation Doubt
- If a self-adjoint operator $A$ commutes with a bounded operator $B$, then $\ker B$ is contained in the domain of $A$
- Usage of the del operator $ \nabla $ as a vector.
- The Laplacian operator of $\;{ {\zeta}_0}^2+{ {\zeta}_1}^2=1\;$
- The algebra generated by derivations
- Is a Sturm-Liouville operator the only 2nd order linear differential operator that is self-adjoint/Hermitian?
- Differential operator acting on a constant
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I read the page. The authors do not obtain this result. The give an example (KdV) of an equation written as $$ \frac{dL}{dt}=[P,L],\;\;\;(1) $$ for operators $L$ and $P$. These equations are part of the class of PDEs that have a "Lax pair". Among its properties, as shown in the book, is the fact that the eigenvalues of $L$ are constant in time.
Another way to see (1) is that it comes from the compatibility condition for the system of two linear questions in "$u$": $$ \frac{du}{dt}=Pu\\ \lambda u=Lu. $$ We usually call the system above the "Lax Pair". We compute the compatibility condition of the system above by multiplying the first one by $\lambda$ and taking the derivative wrt time of the second one. One the two LHS's, we get in both cases $\lambda du/dt$. Equating the two right sides, one gets (1).