Does the existence of a (globally-defined, nowhere-vanishing) vector field on a manifold put any topological conditions on the manifold? c.f. the existence of a globally-defined, nowhere-vanishing spinor field implies a reduction in the structure group. e.g. if we take the manifold to be Minkowski space $\mathbb{R}^{3,1}$, does the structure group get reduced by the existence of a global vector field? And if so, to what subgroup is it reduced to?
Update Thinking about it, I guess on a Riemannian manifold with $O(d)$ structure, this gets reduced to $O(d-1)$ by a global vector field. Still, I'd be grateful if anyone could confirm this, and also my second question below still remains.
Further, if the components of this vector field satisfy $\partial_{(\mu} V_{\nu)}=0$, is there any differential condition on the manifold, e.g. a reduction of holonomy or some integrability condition (Ricci-flatness?) or something?
Suppose that $M$ is a smooth connected manifold.
Your question has two sides to it. One is purely topological when $M$ is not given any extra structure.
The opposite direction is also nontrivial, it is proven by starting with a generic vector field $X$ on $M$. Since $ind(X)=0$, all zeroes of $X$ can be grouped in pairs $p_i, q_i, i=1....,k$, where $ind_{p_i}(X)=1, ind_{q_i}(X)=-1$. Connect the points $p_i, q_i$ by simple smooth arcs $\alpha_i$ in $M$ so that the two distinct arcs are disjoint. Lastly, apply a form of the "Whitney trick" to each pair $p_i,q_i$ along the arc $\alpha_i$ "cancelling the two zeroes". See here.
$p_k=r(2k), q_k=r(2k+1)$, $k\in {\mathbb Z}_+$.
Then again group zeroes of $X$ in pairs: $p_k=r(2k), q_k=r(2k+1)$ of opposite index. Now, take arcs $\alpha_k$ in $\alpha$ connecting $p_k, q_k$, where $\alpha_k=r([2k, 2k+1])$. Lastly, apply the "Whitney trick" as above cancelling the pairs of zeroes.
As for the reduction of the structure group $O(d)$ to $O(d-1)$ where $d$ is the dimension of $M$ (I am assuming here that $M$ is given some Riemannian metric, does not matter which one), then, yes, the existence of such $X$ implies such a reduction. The converse is almost true, except the existence of such reduction only implies the existence of a line field. This line field defined a 1-dimensional foliation on $M$. If this foliation is orientable, then taking the unit vector field tangent to the foliation in the "positive direction." In general, such foliation need not be orientable, but this problem can be eliminated by passing to a suitable 2-fold covering space of $M$.