Let $\lambda_1,...,\lambda_n$ be strictly positive numbers. Then I am looking for the value of $\alpha$ which minimilizes the following expression. $$ \max_{k}|1-\alpha\lambda_k|. $$ It was given to me in a lecture that $\alpha=\frac{2}{\lambda_{min}+\lambda_{max}},$ but I don't understand the derivation. How is this $\alpha$ deduced?
2026-04-13 10:13:33.1776075213
Value of $\alpha$ that minimilizes $\max_{k}|1-\alpha\lambda_k|$
41 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRA-PRECALCULUS
- How to show that $k < m_1+2$?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Finding the value of cot 142.5°
- Why is the following $\frac{3^n}{3^{n+1}}$ equal to $\frac{1}{3}$?
- Extracting the S from formula
- Using trigonometric identities to simply the following expression $\tan\frac{\pi}{5} + 2\tan\frac{2\pi}{5}+ 4\cot\frac{4\pi}{5}=\cot\frac{\pi}{5}$
- Solving an equation involving binomial coefficients
- Is division inherently the last operation when using fraction notation or is the order of operation always PEMDAS?
- How is $\frac{\left(2\left(n+1\right)\right)!}{\left(n+1\right)!}\cdot \frac{n!}{\left(2n\right)!}$ simplified like that?
- How to solve algebraic equation
Related Questions in OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Calculation of distance of a point from a curve
- Find all local maxima and minima of $x^2+y^2$ subject to the constraint $x^2+2y=6$. Does $x^2+y^2$ have a global max/min on the same constraint?
- What does it mean to dualize a constraint in the context of Lagrangian relaxation?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Building the model for a Linear Programming Problem
- Maximize the function
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
Related Questions in SYSTEMS-OF-EQUATIONS
- Can we find $n$ Pythagorean triples with a common leg for any $n$?
- System of equations with different exponents
- Is the calculated solution, if it exists, unique?
- System of simultaneous equations involving integral part (floor)
- Solving a system of two polynomial equations
- Find all possible solution in Z5 with linear system
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Constructing tangent spheres with centers located on vertices of an irregular tetrahedron
- Solve an equation with binary rotation and xor
- Existence of unique limit cycle for $r'=r(μ-r^2), \space θ' = ρ(r^2)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let's take a look at the function $f(x)=|1-ax|, x\in[\lambda_{min},\lambda_{max}]$.
If $a$ is chosen such that $f(x)=0$ somewhere outside $[\lambda_{min},\lambda_{max}]$, the function is a straight line over the interval. This means the highest point will be at $x=\lambda_{min}$ or at $x=\lambda_{max}$. In this case, however, the function will be lower after or before the interval. This means that we need to chose $a$ such that $f(x)=0$ somewhere inside the interval.
If $a$ is chosen such that $f(x)=0$ somewhere inside the interval, the function will "bounce", but the maximum of the function will still be at $x=\lambda_{min}$ or at $x=\lambda_{max}$. The slope after the bounce will be the negative of the slope before the bounce. This means that to minimize the maximum of the function, we need to choose $a$ such that $f(x)$ bounces perfectly in between $\lambda_{min}$ and $\lambda_{max}$, or at $x=\frac{\lambda_{min}+\lambda_{max}}{2}$.
We can use this fact to solve for $a$: $$f(\frac{\lambda_{min}+\lambda_{max}}{2})=0$$ $$|1-a\frac{\lambda_{min}+\lambda_{max}}{2}|=0$$ $$a=\frac{2}{\lambda_{min}+\lambda_{max}}$$
Because the maximum of the function is always either at $\lambda_{min}$ or $\lambda_{max}$, it doesn't matter if if $\lambda_1...\lambda_n$ is the set of all real numbers over the interval or a discrete set of numbers. The expression only depends on the maximum and minimum values of $\lambda$.
I hope this helps!