There seems to be some information missing, but if we make some assumptions, we may be able to generalize to where the assumptions don't matter.
Now, it looks like $\triangle ABC$ is a right triangle with hypotenuse $x_2$. It also appears that angle $A$ is 45º. If these two assumptions are correct, then we have an isosceles right triangle. The measurements of $x_1=10$ and $x_2=14$ provide validity that these assumptions are correct. (WHY? I leave this as an exercise for the OP.)
A third assumption we can make is that $x_3$ bisects side $BC$. If this is true, then $x_3$ bisects the angle $A$ (which we are assuming to be 45º). Using $SOH-CAH-TOA$ then, we have $\cos22.5 =\frac{x_1}{x_3}$, so $x_3\approx10.8$.
If we discard our assumptions and find more data regarding the triangle, then we have, in general, $x_3=x_1\div\cos(BAD)$.
There seems to be some information missing, but if we make some assumptions, we may be able to generalize to where the assumptions don't matter.
Now, it looks like $\triangle ABC$ is a right triangle with hypotenuse $x_2$. It also appears that angle $A$ is 45º. If these two assumptions are correct, then we have an isosceles right triangle. The measurements of $x_1=10$ and $x_2=14$ provide validity that these assumptions are correct. (WHY? I leave this as an exercise for the OP.)
A third assumption we can make is that $x_3$ bisects side $BC$. If this is true, then $x_3$ bisects the angle $A$ (which we are assuming to be 45º). Using $SOH-CAH-TOA$ then, we have $\cos22.5 =\frac{x_1}{x_3}$, so $x_3\approx10.8$.
If we discard our assumptions and find more data regarding the triangle, then we have, in general, $x_3=x_1\div\cos(BAD)$.